Previously we were using backtrace 0.3.39, which has a [bug] that causes
it to segault in some circumstances. I experienced this bug while trying
to fix the minimal-versions build in !1508.
[bug]: https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/issues/267
These crates are at version 0.x.y, so we don't need to distinguish
new-feature changes from other changes:
```
tor-basic-utils
fs-mistrust
tor-error
tor-geoip
tor-checkable
tor-linkspec
tor-netdoc
tor-netdir
tor-persist
tor-ptmgr
tor-hsservice
```
This crate has a breaking change, but only when the semver-breaking
feature `experimental-api` is enabled:
```
tor-config
```
This crate is at version 1.x.y, but has no new public APIs, and
therefore does not need a minor version bump:
```
arti
```
These crates had first-order breaking changes:
```
retry-error
tor-keymgr
tor-proto
tor-hsclient
tor-rtmock
```
Additionally, these broke because they re-exposed RetryError:
```
tor-circmgr
```
Additionally, these broke because they may re-expose something from
tor-proto:
```
arti-client
tor-chanmgr
tor-dirclient
tor-dirmgr
tor-guardmgr
```
Additionally, these broke for other fiddly reasons:
`tor-ptmgr` implements traits from tor-chanmgr, which has a breaking
change above.
`arti-hyper` exposes types from arti-client in its API.
This abolishes some quintuplication.
The output is identical except that:
* The syntax display in the rustdoc output for the resulting macros
seems to have somewhat less whitepsace.
* The whimsical error messages in the examples are all identical.
Ah well.
The main contribution here is a set of convenience macros for
logging error `Report`s. Notably, this macros always logs
`Internal` and `BadAspiUsage` errors at `WARN`, unless they
are already at `ERROR` or more.
This is a little tricky because `tracing::event!()` requires
its Level argument to be a constant.
Done with the commands below.
The following crates have had various changes, and should get a
patchlevel bump. Since they are pre-1.0, we do not need to
distinguish new APIs from other changes.
```
cargo set-version --bump patch -p arti-client
cargo set-version --bump patch -p safelog
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-bytes
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-cert
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-circmgr
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-config
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-consdiff
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-dirclient
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-dirmgr
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-error
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-hsservice
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-linkspec
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-llcrypto
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-netdir
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-netdoc
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-proto
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-rpcbase
cargo set-version --bump patch -p tor-socksproto
```
This crate has new features, but no new non-experimental Rust APIs.
So even though it is post-1.0, it gets a patchlevel bump.
```
cargo set-version --bump patch -p arti
```
This does the following:
- Gives every crate a `full`.
- Cause every `full` to depend on `full` from the lower-level
crates.
- Makes every feature listed _directly_ in `experimental` depend
on `__is_experimental`.
0.99.[012] have a bug https://github.com/JelteF/derive_more/issues/114
which makes the Deref derive for bridgedesc::StateGuard not work
and therefore breaks minimal-versions CI.
It seems simpler to require the newer version everywhere.
Since our last round of releases, these crates have had either
trivial changes, or changes that did not affect their APIs.
Therefore we are bumping their versions, but not changing which
versions of them other crates depend on.
I followed the following procedure to make these changes:
* I used maint/changed_crates to find out which crates had changed
since 0.3.0.
* I used grep and maint/list_crates to sort those crates in
topological (dependency) order.
* I looked through semver_status to find which crates were listed as
having semver-relevant changes (new APIs and breaking changes).
* I scanned through the git logs of the crates with no
semver-relevant changes listed to confirm that, indeed, they had
no changes. For those crates, I incremented their patch-level
version _without_ changing the version that other crates depend on.
* I scanned through the git logs of the crates with no
semver-relevant changes listed to confirm that, indeed, they had
no obvious breaking changes.
* I treated all crates that depend on `arti` and/or `arti-client` as
having breaking changes.
* I identified crates that depend on crates that have changed, even
if they have not changed themselves, and identified them as having
a non-breaking change.
* For all of the crates, I used `cargo set-version -p $CRATE --bump
$STATUS` (where `STATUS` is `patch` or `minor`) to update the
versions, and the depended-upon versions.
This is an automated change made with a perl one-liner and verified
with grep -L and grep -l.
Some warnings are introduced with this change; they will be removed
in subsequent commits.
See arti#208 for older discussion on this issue.
Not all of these strictly need to be bumped to 0.2.0; many could go
to 0.1.1 instead. But since everything at the tor-rtcompat and
higher layers has had breaking API changes, it seems not so useful
to distinguish. (It seems unlikely that anybody at this stage is
depending on e.g. tor-protover but not arti-client.)
This needs two kinds. We have decided to treat a non-shutdown
SpawnError as "unexplained" rather than as an InternalError.
There are many crates whose
From<futures::task::SpawnError> for Error
erroneously treat it as an internal error. We will fix them in a moment.
Gabriela Moldovan
Nick Mathewson
Ian Jackson
trinity-1686a
Samanta Navarro