This is in lieu of upgrading to the latest base64 crate, which has
a different API from the old one. Since we have to migrate either
way, we might as well use base64ct everywhere.
I don't think that most of these cases _require_ constant-time
base64, but it won't hurt.
These are a bit complex internally, but the API they present is
pretty simple. I've left some discussion of points where the design
isn't totally fleshed out, and where we need to look harder at the
spec.
Part of #716.
On 1.22, cargo audit is complaining about RUSTSEC-2023-0001.
We aren't affected, since we don't use windows named pipes (yet),
but let's make cargo audit happier.
This module has types and operations needed in multiple places
for an onion service implementation. There are a bunch of
TODO hs-crypto comments that we'll need to fill in.
This is the new upstream version (published by me, recently).
It has the same MSRV and one breaking change:
The caller who specifies a home dir function for substituting into
strings, must now supply a string, not Path. Previously shellexpand
would allow the caller to supply non-unicode data, and then simply not
substitute it. That was an infelicity in the shellexpand API.
Now this infelicity is pushed into our code. The overall behaviour of
Arti hasn't changed as a result. And it seems reasonable to me.
shellexpand 3.x also has a module for expanding Paths instead, in
response to requests for this filed as upstream tickets. We *could*
use that but I am not sanguine about that approach: the Pathness would
spread throughout much of our config and file handling code.
I think we should at the very least postpone trying to work with
invalid-unicode-paths as long as we can.
As near as I can tell, the rust-crypto SHA1 crate was called `sha-1`
for a while because of a conflict with a different SHA1 crate. Now
they apparently have the `sha1` name back and have deprecated the
`sha-1` name.
This makes a `pt_state` directory inside .local/share/arti (or the
local equivalent), right next to our existing `state` dir.
Ideally we would use a separate directory for each PT, but we have a
very fuzzy "what is a specific PT" notion.
Closes#667
These are implementation details and we don't want to mark them as
stable.
To do this, I needed to apply some additional options to the example
code's configuration in Cargo.toml.
This commit implements `PtMgr`, a pluggable transport manager
responsible for keeping track of spawned PTs and spawning them to
satisfy client requests on demand.
It does this in two parts: the `PtMgr` type exported to the rest of the
code, and the background `PtReactor` that actually does the spawning;
this design ensures that only one attempt to spawn a PT is active at a
time, and will prove useful later for implementing e.g. timeouts.
A few changes were necessary to the rest of the code in order to make
this all work out. Namely:
- `TransportRegistry`'s API didn't make any sense for two reasons:
- It wasn't feasible for implementors to implement `ChannelFactory`,
since that'd require constructing a `ChanBuilder` (which requires a
bootstrap reporting event sender).
- Treating the PT manager as a registry is over-general; it's only
necessary for it to spawn pluggable transports, so saddling it with
other concerns didn't make any sense.
- (It's possible to get extensibility for arbitrary user customization
by just letting the user swap in a new `ChannelFactory`, anyway.)
- Therefore, the `PtMgr` implements the new `AbstractPtMgr` trait, which
is far more narrowly focused; this only exists to solve a dependency
loop, and is documented as such.
- This provides a `TransportHelper` instead of a `ChannelFactory`.
This struct is going to be the principal "dictionary-style" serde
representation for a bridge, and the builder, making this all in
keeping with our usual approach.
In this commit:
* Introduce the struct (defining the serialisation)
* Provide the setters (defining the Rust API)
* Add success test cases (not all of the data in which is used yet)
We previously had a trace message on _every_ change. That's fine,
but we also want to log more important changes where the user
can see them. Namely:
* If we go from any other status to Reachable, we want to tell
the user. (We don't want to spam them if it was already
reachable.)
* If we go from Untried or Reachable to Unreachable, we want to
tell the user. (We don't tell them about changes from Retriable
to Unreachable, since that just means that a retry attempt
was not successful.)
Closes#627.
This brings the draft configuration mechanisms in tor-ptmgr in line with
the config in other crates, using builders. It also plumbs the config
type through into the main `arti-client` config, and adds some example
lines to `arti-example-config.toml`.
Nick Mathewson
eta
Michael van Straten
Ian Jackson
Neel Chauhan
coral
Ian Jackson
trinity-1686a