These crates didn't have any changes until now, when I bumped
the versions of some other crates they depend on:
tor-consdiff
arti-hyper
arti-bench
arti-testing
These crates have had small code changes, but no API additions:
tor-config
tor-socksproto
tor-cert
tor-chanmgr
tor-ptmgr
tor-guardmgr
tor-circmgr
tor-dirclient
tor-dirmgr
arti
tor-hsservice
tor-congestion
These crates have had API extensions:
fs-mistrust
tor-llcrypto
tor-bytes
tor-checkable
tor-linkspec
tor-netdoc
tor-persist
arti-client
These changes influence behavior, but not effect compatibility.
(If I messed up, and any crate except for `arti` has non-breaking
API changes, that's still fine, since they are all version
0.x.)
This warning kind of snuck up on us! (See #748) For now, let's
disable it. (I've cleaned it up in a couple of examples, since
those are meant to be more idiomatic and user-facing.)
Closes#748.
Also replace Arg::takes_value with Arg::action to configure flags
that don't take parameters vs options that do.
This makes it easy to upgrade to clap 4.
Tested deprecations with:
cargo check --workspace --all-features --features clap/deprecated
This removes the last cargo audit override (for the unmaintained
ansi_term).
Don't mark options as required when they have default values:
see <https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/pull/3793>.
(Since the APIs for the `Schedule::sleep*` functions changed, this
is a breaking change in tor-rtcompat. Therefore, the Runtime trait
in tor-rtcompat is now a different trait. Therefore, anything that
uses the Runtime trait in its APIs has also broken.)
Because we want to work more on ensuring that our semver stability
story is solid, we are _not_ bumping arti-client to 1.0.0 right now.
Here are the bumps we _are_ doing. Crates with "minor" bumps have
had API breaks; crates with "patch" bumps have had new APIs added.
Note that `tor-congestion` is not bumped here: it's a new crate, and
hasn't been published before.
```
tor-basic-utils minor
fs-mistrust minor
tor-config minor
tor-rtcompat minor
tor-rtmock minor
tor-llcrypto patch
tor-bytes patch
tor-linkspec minor
tor-cell minor
tor-proto minor
tor-netdoc patch
tor-netdir minor
tor-persist patch
tor-chanmgr minor
tor-guardmgr minor
tor-circmgr minor
tor-dirmgr minor
arti-client minor
arti-hyper minor
arti major
arti-bench minor
arti-testing minor
```
As per
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/merge_requests/682#note_2830860
And subsequent IRC discussion.
Having done the work as per review comments, I don't much like the
result. It's quite un-ergonomiuc. If we can't have fs autodetection,
I think syntactic autodetection within sources.rs would be nearly as
nice.
However, I seem to be outvoted. At least the externally visible
functionality (of an arti binary, say) is reasonably ergonomic.
This performs the transitive closure of the last operation:
everything that depends on a crate with a breaking change gets the
version which it depends on bumped.
```
cargo set-version -p tor-proto --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-netdoc --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti-hyper --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti-bench --bump minor
cargo set-version -p arti-testing --bump minor
cargo set-version -p tor-config --bump minor
```
This commit was made by reverting the previous commit, then
re-running the script I used to generate it. In theory there should
be no semantic changes: only changes due to improved formatting from
cargo edit.
I followed the following procedure to make these changes:
* I used maint/changed_crates to find out which crates had changed
since 0.3.0.
* I used grep and maint/list_crates to sort those crates in
topological (dependency) order.
* I looked through semver_status to find which crates were listed as
having semver-relevant changes (new APIs and breaking changes).
* I scanned through the git logs of the crates with no
semver-relevant changes listed to confirm that, indeed, they had
no changes. For those crates, I incremented their patch-level
version _without_ changing the version that other crates depend on.
* I scanned through the git logs of the crates with no
semver-relevant changes listed to confirm that, indeed, they had
no obvious breaking changes.
* I treated all crates that depend on `arti` and/or `arti-client` as
having breaking changes.
* I identified crates that depend on crates that have changed, even
if they have not changed themselves, and identified them as having
a non-breaking change.
* For all of the crates, I used `cargo set-version -p $CRATE --bump
$STATUS` (where `STATUS` is `patch` or `minor`) to update the
versions, and the depended-upon versions.
This gets rid of `#[serde(flatten)]` which prevents serde_ignored (and
other kinds of introspection) from working properly.
The price is now that the toplevel has to deal with two configuration
objects.
The Resolvable trait is overkill right now, but is going to do More
Things in a moment. In particular, we need the impl on tuples, so
that the whole config can be processed in one go.
Generally, change the paths that mention the crate name to go via a
module-level "use".
This involves adding tor-config as a direct dependency for a few
crates.
This is a benchmarking tool, and fs-mistrust doesn't like the
permissions in our CI. The env var ARTI_FS_DISABLE_PERMISSION_CHECKS
is (of course) specific to arti. Maybe it should be honoured here,
or this should be done via the config files.
But disabling this is fine for now.
This is an automated change made with a perl one-liner and verified
with grep -L and grep -l.
Some warnings are introduced with this change; they will be removed
in subsequent commits.
See arti#208 for older discussion on this issue.
Not all of these strictly need to be bumped to 0.2.0; many could go
to 0.1.1 instead. But since everything at the tor-rtcompat and
higher layers has had breaking API changes, it seems not so useful
to distinguish. (It seems unlikely that anybody at this stage is
depending on e.g. tor-protover but not arti-client.)
Instead of requiring a `Box<dyn Isolation>`, it now takes either a
`Box<dyn Isolation>`, or an arbitrary `T` that implements
`Isolation`.
This API still allows the user to pass in a `Box<dyn Isolation>` if
that's what they have, but it doesn't require them to Box the
isolation on their own.
Part of #414.
Nick Mathewson
Ian Jackson
Gabriel de Perthuis
trinity-1686a
Orhun Parmaksız
eta