This commit was made by reverting the previous commit, then
re-running the script I used to generate it. In theory there should
be no semantic changes: only changes due to improved formatting from
cargo edit.
I followed the following procedure to make these changes:
* I used maint/changed_crates to find out which crates had changed
since 0.3.0.
* I used grep and maint/list_crates to sort those crates in
topological (dependency) order.
* I looked through semver_status to find which crates were listed as
having semver-relevant changes (new APIs and breaking changes).
* I scanned through the git logs of the crates with no
semver-relevant changes listed to confirm that, indeed, they had
no changes. For those crates, I incremented their patch-level
version _without_ changing the version that other crates depend on.
* I scanned through the git logs of the crates with no
semver-relevant changes listed to confirm that, indeed, they had
no obvious breaking changes.
* I treated all crates that depend on `arti` and/or `arti-client` as
having breaking changes.
* I identified crates that depend on crates that have changed, even
if they have not changed themselves, and identified them as having
a non-breaking change.
* For all of the crates, I used `cargo set-version -p $CRATE --bump
$STATUS` (where `STATUS` is `patch` or `minor`) to update the
versions, and the depended-upon versions.
This gets rid of `#[serde(flatten)]` which prevents serde_ignored (and
other kinds of introspection) from working properly.
The price is now that the toplevel has to deal with two configuration
objects.
The Resolvable trait is overkill right now, but is going to do More
Things in a moment. In particular, we need the impl on tuples, so
that the whole config can be processed in one go.
Generally, change the paths that mention the crate name to go via a
module-level "use".
This involves adding tor-config as a direct dependency for a few
crates.
This is a benchmarking tool, and fs-mistrust doesn't like the
permissions in our CI. The env var ARTI_FS_DISABLE_PERMISSION_CHECKS
is (of course) specific to arti. Maybe it should be honoured here,
or this should be done via the config files.
But disabling this is fine for now.
This is an automated change made with a perl one-liner and verified
with grep -L and grep -l.
Some warnings are introduced with this change; they will be removed
in subsequent commits.
See arti#208 for older discussion on this issue.
Not all of these strictly need to be bumped to 0.2.0; many could go
to 0.1.1 instead. But since everything at the tor-rtcompat and
higher layers has had breaking API changes, it seems not so useful
to distinguish. (It seems unlikely that anybody at this stage is
depending on e.g. tor-protover but not arti-client.)
Instead of requiring a `Box<dyn Isolation>`, it now takes either a
`Box<dyn Isolation>`, or an arbitrary `T` that implements
`Isolation`.
This API still allows the user to pass in a `Box<dyn Isolation>` if
that's what they have, but it doesn't require them to Box the
isolation on their own.
Part of #414.
Previously we tried to do each connection in a run, and only then did we
start transferring data over them. Now we collect a bunch of the
futures that return an open stream, and run them all in parallel
with using them. This change includes connect-time in our
benchmarks, and allows us to test contention in our connect code.
Instead of using a Stream, I've changed the connection-generation
code to call a future-returning function directly, so we have a way
to explicitly pass which run we're in.
This makes using the `PreferredRuntime` the first-class option inside
`arti-client`, freeing users who don't want to think about runtimes from
having to do so.
`TorClient::create_unbootstrapped` and `builder` now automatically
use this runtime, leaving only `builder_custom` for users who wish to
manually specify a runtime.
This lets us clean up the docs a lot: mentions of using custom runtimes
are now relegated to nearer the end of the crate-level documentation,
and we mostly just link to `tor_rtcompat`'s docs to explain more there.
Instead, we take some more time to explain how you use the builder API
to create clients synchronously.
Other doc cleanups included getting rid of the explanation of `TorAddr`
in the main crate-level doc; this is already well-documented elsewhere,
and is something users should discover organically later.
fixes arti#326
This lint is IMO inherently ill-conceived.
I have looked for the reasons why this might be thought to be a good
idea and there were basically two (and they are sort of contradictory):
I. "Calling ‘.clone()` on an Rc, Arc, or Weak can obscure the fact
that only the pointer is being cloned, not the underlying data."
This is the wording from
https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/v0.0.212/#clone_on_ref_ptr
It is a bit terse; we are left to infer why it is a bad idea to
obscure this fact. It seems to me that if it is bad to obscure some
fact, that must be because the fact is a hazard. But why would it be
a hazard to not copy the underlying data ?
In other languages, faliing to copy the underlying data is a serious
correctness hazard. There is a whose class of bugs where things were
not copied, and then mutated and/or reused in multiple places in ways
that were not what the programmer intended. In my experience, this is
a very common bug when writing Python and Javascript. I'm told it's
common in golang too.
But in Rust this bug is much much harder to write. The data inside an
Arc is immutable. To have this bug you'd have use interior mutability
- ie mess around with Mutex or RefCell. That provides a good barrier
to these kind of accidents.
II. "The reason for writing Rc::clone and Arc::clone [is] to make it
clear that only the pointer is being cloned, as opposed to the
underlying data. The former is always fast, while the latter can
be very expensive depending on what is being cloned."
This is the reasoning found here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/2048
This is saying that *not* using Arc::clone is hazardous.
Specifically, that a deep clone is a performance hazard.
But for this argument, the lint is precisely backwards. It's linting
the "good" case and asking for it to be written in a more explicit
way; while the supposedly bad case can be written conveniently.
Also, many objects (in our codebase, and in all the libraries we use)
that are Clone are in fact simply handles. They contain Arc(s) (or
similar) and are cheap to clone. Indeed, that is the usual case.
It does not make sense to distinguish in the syntax we use to clone
such a handle, whether the handle is a transparent Arc, or an opaque
struct containing one or more other handles.
Forcing Arc::clone to be written as such makes for code churn when a
type is changed from Arc<Something> to Something: Clone, or vice
versa.
This is the first one where anyhow::Error impl AsRef<dyn StdError>
We want this because we want to add error reporting functionality
which works with all kinds of errors, which means we need an
anyhow::Error which can be vieweed as a StdError.
(The alternative would be to deref at the call sites of
report_and_exit, making it less ergonomic.)
anyhow 1.0.23 is from November 2019.
This commit changes how the `TorClient` type works, enabling it to be
constructed synchronously without initiating the bootstrapping process.
Daemon tasks are still started on construction (although some of them
won't do anything if the client isn't bootstrapped).
The old bootstrap() methods are now reimplemented in terms of the new
create_unbootstrapped() and bootstrap_existing() methods.
This required refactoring how the `DirMgr` works to enable the same sort
of thing there.
closes#293
This is by no means our final API, but should represent an
improvement. Here instead of having to specify a list of files and
their is-this-optional status, along with a list of command-line
options, we have a single structure that encapsulates all of that
information.
Two advantages here:
- Callers no longer have to remember what the boolean means.
- We can "reload" more easily, by keeping the source object around.
This change also implements the correct behavior for our default
configuration file in `arti::main`: if the file is absent and the
user doesn't list a config file, that's no problem. But if the user
lists _that very same config file, we should insist that it be
present.
This implements the proposal from arti#298, making the
`BenchmarkResults` type be made out of a bunch of new `Statistic` types
(which summarize the mean, median, range, and standard deviation of an
arbitrary value) instead of overloading `TimingSummary` for this
purpose.
This commit puts the native-tls crate behind a feature. The feature
is off-by-default in the tor-rtcompat crate, but can be enabled
either from arti or arti-client.
There is an included script that I used to test that tor-rtcompat
could build and run its tests with all subsets of its features.
Closes#300
We now conduct benchmark tests with multiple concurrent streams (by
default; this is configurable by passing `-p` to `arti-bench`).
Currently, these results just get "flattened" for the purposes of
statistical analysis (as in, results_raw contains the results of each
connection's timing summary, across all benchmark runs). This might be
something we wish to change in future.
The stats summary now also records "best" and "worst" values for each
metric, to give a rough idea of the range of values encountered.
Additionally, we now support writing the benchmark results out to a JSON
file. A future commit may integrate this with CI, so that we have
benchmark results for every commit as a build artefact.
(some documentation was also fixed)
part of arti#292
Orhun Parmaksız
Nick Mathewson
Ian Jackson
eta
trinity-1686a
Dimitris Apostolou
Ian Jackson