As a matter of good crypto practice, we shouldn't use
short-circuiting checks to compare keys or key-like objects, since
the amount of time taken by those checks can leak information about
their inputs.
I don't think it's actually _necessary_ to use a constant-time
operation in this case, but let's establish the precedent.
This is a follow-up to !724.
Because we want to work more on ensuring that our semver stability
story is solid, we are _not_ bumping arti-client to 1.0.0 right now.
Here are the bumps we _are_ doing. Crates with "minor" bumps have
had API breaks; crates with "patch" bumps have had new APIs added.
Note that `tor-congestion` is not bumped here: it's a new crate, and
hasn't been published before.
```
tor-basic-utils minor
fs-mistrust minor
tor-config minor
tor-rtcompat minor
tor-rtmock minor
tor-llcrypto patch
tor-bytes patch
tor-linkspec minor
tor-cell minor
tor-proto minor
tor-netdoc patch
tor-netdir minor
tor-persist patch
tor-chanmgr minor
tor-guardmgr minor
tor-circmgr minor
tor-dirmgr minor
arti-client minor
arti-hyper minor
arti major
arti-bench minor
arti-testing minor
```
This will be convenient for managing when to send these negotiation
messages.
While we're here, edit the comment to explain how this is (going to
be) used.
Do _not_ bump the dependency versions on crates that have had no
changes since arti 0.0.5, since those crates do not depend on the
new APIs.
```
cargo set-version -p tor-basic-utils --bump patch
cargo set-version -p tor-llcrypto --bump patch
git restore crates/tor-checkable
git restore crates/tor-consdiff
git restore crates/tor-rtmock
```
This comprises four renames:
```
write_onto -> write_onto_infallible
write_into -> write_into_infallible
write -> write_infallible
writer_and_consume -> write_and_consume_infallible.
```
The rest of this branch will be concerned with replacing these
`_infallible` methods with ones that return a `Result`. This is
part of #513.
This implements a higher-level API for the ntor v3 handshake, in line
with that exposed by the ntor handshake. It does not, however, use the
existing `ClientHandshake` trait, due to fundamental differences in the
handshakes (namely, that the v3 handshake can include some additional
extra extension data).
Currently, the higher-level API assumes circuit extension, and copies
the (undocumented!) magic verification string from c-tor that indicates
this usage.
A rudimentary set of functions for serializing and deserializing
extensions to be sent with the handshake is also included, implementing
the protocol in proposal 332 § A.2. Currently, it only implements the
congestion control extensions specified in proposal 324 § 10.3.
part of arti#88
According to doc/Errors.md, and in keeping with current best
practices, we should not include display an error's `source()` as
part of that error's display method. Instead, we should let the
caller decide to call source() and display that error in turn.
Part of #323.
The "full" feature is a catch-all for all features, _except_:
* Those that select a particular implementation (like
tor-llcrypto/with-openssl) or build flag (like "static")
* Those that are experimental or unstable (like "experimental-api")
* Those that are testing-only.
After changes to the prop339, the domain name in an Address can only be
255 bytes max and can NOT contain nul byte(s).
Unit tests had to be modified to accept this change:
- Centralise msg_ip_address
- Add currently-passing tests for address length
- Test counted address length longer than type wants
Related to #463
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Nick Mathewson
Yuan Lyu
trinity-1686a
Ian Jackson
Emptycup
eta
Ian Jackson
David Goulet