According to doc/Errors.md, and in keeping with current best
practices, we should not include display an error's `source()` as
part of that error's display method. Instead, we should let the
caller decide to call source() and display that error in turn.
Part of #323.
The `DirBootstrapStatus` type now exposes a blockage() method to
return an `Option<DirBlockage>`.
The blockage types reported are more low-level than I'd like, but
they are IMO good enough for now: we'll want to get experience with
actual vs hypothetical problems before we refine them.
A "reset" happens whenever we have to start a download attempt over
-- either because we ran out of retries, or we found something wrong
with the consensus after fetching certificates.
An "error" happens when we have a recoverable error from one or more
directory sources.
A "stall" happens whenever a round of downloads or cache loads leads
to no change in the status.
We don't yet use this as part of our status reporting.
Previously we used the "if-modified-since" time associated with the
consensus download, and/or the "valid-after" time in the consensus
attempt, to put multiple attempts into sequence, and to tell one
from another. But that approach was always a kludge, and will soon
get more unreliable as the DirStatus logic gets a bit more complex.
With this commit, we change separate download attempts to be
identified with an AttemptId that increments whenever we decide to
get a different directory from the one we have. IMO this new code
is _much_ cleaner.
This is about to become only a _part_ of what defines a DirStatus: a
DirStatus will also include a reset count, and some kind of info
about how long we've gone without progress.
This change also means that we need to create the handle and scheduler
earlier in the process of creating the DirMgr. If we don't, we won't
have a way to manage the task before bootstrap() returns.
The "full" feature is a catch-all for all features, _except_:
* Those that select a particular implementation (like
tor-llcrypto/with-openssl) or build flag (like "static")
* Those that are experimental or unstable (like "experimental-api")
* Those that are testing-only.
This change (not yet exposed as an API) will let the TorClient have
a `TaskHandle` corresponding to the directory task, letting it
make the directory task dormant as needed.
This only affects uses of thread_rng(), and affects them all more or
less indiscriminately. One test does not work with
ARTI_TEST_PRNG=deterministic; the next commit will fix it.
This commit was made by reverting the previous commit, then
re-running the script I used to generate it. In theory there should
be no semantic changes: only changes due to improved formatting from
cargo edit.
I followed the following procedure to make these changes:
* I used maint/changed_crates to find out which crates had changed
since 0.3.0.
* I used grep and maint/list_crates to sort those crates in
topological (dependency) order.
* I looked through semver_status to find which crates were listed as
having semver-relevant changes (new APIs and breaking changes).
* I scanned through the git logs of the crates with no
semver-relevant changes listed to confirm that, indeed, they had
no changes. For those crates, I incremented their patch-level
version _without_ changing the version that other crates depend on.
* I scanned through the git logs of the crates with no
semver-relevant changes listed to confirm that, indeed, they had
no obvious breaking changes.
* I treated all crates that depend on `arti` and/or `arti-client` as
having breaking changes.
* I identified crates that depend on crates that have changed, even
if they have not changed themselves, and identified them as having
a non-breaking change.
* For all of the crates, I used `cargo set-version -p $CRATE --bump
$STATUS` (where `STATUS` is `patch` or `minor`) to update the
versions, and the depended-upon versions.
Now that the relevant functions now report changed/not-changed
status via a boolean out-parameter (see !527), there's no reason to
have a separate NoChanged error case.
Closes#484.
Previously in !511 I had introduced a bug where, if there was an
error more serious than "no change", that error would keep us from
noticing that we had no change, and we'd loop until the safety
counter ran out. Then we'd panic.
This commit fixes the bug by reintroducing the `changed` boolean --
this time as an outparam for the add_from_* methods.
Fixes#482.
eta
Ian Jackson
Nick Mathewson
Ian Jackson
Orhun Parmaksız