This was triggering on private updates after gossip changes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1diff --git a/tests/test_gossip.py b/tests/test_gossip.py
index 677ec4825..285290b71 100644
When we rewrite, we actually use the remote channel_announcement signatures from the db, and notice that l1 here is actually l2:
```
0266e4598d1d3c415f572a8488830b60f7e744ed9235eb0b1ba93283b315c03518-chan#1: gossipd rejected our channel announcement: WARNING: Bad node_signature_1 304402204ad9f0ca9b5f1f8eec61290b6008bf2c15f011e35543d25c35c5b89d2e1a183402201aaca5883714dbe11d6ae00a146fac7302352e1b9e987eee5ce98e8eb6a82909 hash e713698e14d3d8f973210e8d93c96d1a7c117c58340ccb195785a672fd0b5ef1 on channel_announcement 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
```
Explicitly remove those messages.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
- Documented `mindepth` and `reserve` in `fundchannel_start`. These
parameters are supported but had not been documented (yet).
- Removed `mindepth` from return-type. I'm unable to find any scenario
in which a value is returned.
- Documented the 312 error code
We had a complete copy of the `db_provider` and associated classes in
teh `tests/` directory, causing them to drift apart. Consolidating on
one version makes this more maintainable.
Changelog-None
For example, lnprototest got the error 'You gave bad parameters: Did not support channel_type ' which doesn't make it clear that it's rejecting the empty channel type.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Let's tell the caller what channel_type they got!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `fundchannel`, `multifundchannel`, `fundchannel_start` and `openchannel_init`: new field `channel_type`.
As suggested in https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/1092.
We still support channels opened without it, but you can no longer open new ones without it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: `option_gossip_queries` is now required (advertized by all but 16 nodes)
We're about to make static_remotekey compulsory, but we still want to
do tests for pre-existing channels.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And add a request schema for multifundchannel.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `fundchannel` and `multifundchannel` now take an optional `channel_type` parameter.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And add request schemas for openchannel_init and fundchannel_start.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `fundchannel_start` and `openchannel_init` now take an optional `channel_type` parameter.
We use an array of bit numbers. We could use an array of names, but the JSON typing is then harder.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As suggested in https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/1092.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: `option_gossip_queries` is now required (advertized by all but 11 nodes)
As suggested in https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/1092.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: `option_data_loss_protect` is now required (advertized by all but 11 nodes)
It fails because this is an array of enum values, which is a
combination we hadn't seen before. Replacing this with a manually
managed enum, since it is likely we'll want to reuse it in the future.
Min. Cost Flow does not take into account fees when computing a flow
with liquidity constraints.
This is a work-around solution that reduces the amount on every route to
respect the liquidity bound. The deficity in the delivered amount is
solved by running MCF once again.
Changes:
1. the function `flow_complete` allocates amounts to send over the set of routes
computed by the MCF algorithm, but it does not allocate more than liquidity
bound of the route. For this reason `minflow` returns a set of routes that
satisfy the liquidity bounds but it is not guaranteed that the total payment
reaches the destination therefore there could a deficit in the delivery:
`deficit = amount_to_deliver - delivering`.
2. in the function `add_payflows` after `minflow` returns a set of routes we
call `flows_fit_amount` that tries to a allocate the `deficit` in the routes
that the MCF have computed.
3. if the resulting flows pass all payment constraints then we update
`amount_to_deliver = amount_to_deliver - delivering`, and the loop
repeats as long as `amount_to_deliver` is not zero.
In other words, the excess amount, beyond the liquidity bound,
in the routes is removed and then we try to allocate it
into known routes, otherwise we do a whole MCF again just for the
remaining amount.
Fixes issue #6599
We stopped doing empty journal logs, so we no longer need to switch
our log severity based on whether or not an account exists.
Should make bookkeeper less chatty and remove noisy logs
Changelog-None
We were putting out a lot of empty journal entries. Let's
stop doing that.
Now the wallet balance stays uninitialized until/unless you have
funds in it.
Fixes#5672
And we don't need to handle 0.9 lightningd which didn't include
allow-deprecated-apis in getmanifest call.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Unfortunately, this is awkward: we just copy through most requests,
so we can't easily add a "deprecation" field to each one. So we do
a notification if the next command has a different deprecation status
than the global one, but that requires opt-in from the plugin.
We didn't previously document the subscriptions array, so do that now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Plugins: `deprecated_oneshot` notifiction subscription to change deprecated status for a single command.
I did some CHANGELOG and git digging to see when these were deprecated, and
some were very old (v0.8.2!). But since they didn't warn users loudly, I
chose to do so this release only.
I renamed ld's `deprecated_apis` to `deprecated_ok` to make sure I
caught them all.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Type-checking in Python is so loose you could already do this, but this updates the
mypy type annotations.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We still accept boolean: the plugin may not want to commit to a deprecation schedule.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Plugins: rpcmethods and options can set `deprecated` to a pair of version strings, not just a boolean.
Rusty Russell
Erik De Smedt
Christian Decker
Tushar Vyas
Devrandom
Ken Sedgwick
Lagrang3
niftynei