This is a case where we assume that the `channel->scid` is set, which
is no longer true with `zeroconf`
Changelog-None: Zeroconf was not yet released at the time the discovery was made
Reported-by: Yaacov Akiba Slama <@yaslama>
Reported-by: Roei Erez <@roeierez>
If you build a PSBT externally from CLN and attempt to sign for the
output, we would crash. Now we don't crash.
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: `signpsbt` will now add redeemscript + witness-utxo to the PSBT for an input that we can sign for, before signing it.
Fixes#5499 ?
It crashes with:
```
s32 field doesn't match size: expected 4, actual 8
```
Reported-by: @zerofeerouting
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
we weren't making records for 'missed' accounts that had a zero balance
at snapshot time (if peer opens channel and is unused)
Fixes: #5502
Reported-By: https://github.com/niftynei/cln-logmaid
Again, we should use the real channel_type, but we approximate.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: private channels will only route using short-channel-ids if channel opened with option_scid_alias-supporting peer.
We *should* remember the channel type, since this is only required
if they set the channel_type to include option_scid_alias.
However, since we support channel upgrade, channel_type really needs
a new table. I have a patch for that, from my abandoned original
"fastopen" branch for aliases, but it's too big a chance for rc2 IMHO.
Meanwhile, we allow exposeprivatechannels's scids to be either real or
the aliases.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: invoice routehints will use fake short-channel-ids for private channels if channel opened with option_scid_alias-supporting peer.
Track rebalances, and report income events for them.
Previously `listincome` would report:
- invoice event, debit, outgoing channel
- invoice_fee event, debit, outgoing channel
- invoice event, credit, inbound channel
Now reports:
- rebalance_fee, debit, outgoing channel
(same value as invoice_fee above)
Note: only applies on channel events; if a rebalance falls to chain
we'll use the older style of accounting.
Changelog-None
AFAICT we should have been doing this since we started sending and
receiving it, but didn't.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: we now advertize the `option_channel_type` feature (which we actually supported since v0.10.2)
We were seeing flakes due to channel closures on intermidiary nodes if
the blocks came too fast.
If we use a star topology it's actually what we want and it's much simpler to
figure out what's going on.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't actually care how it does it, just that it ends the HTLCs,
so simplify this logic which tries to match it exactly.
This also fixes the flake where we would sometimes close the upstream
channels, simply because we now wait at least one second per block.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
First, how we record "our_funds" and then apply pushes vs lease_fees
(for liquidity ad buys/sales) was exactly opposite.
For pushes we were reporting the total funded into the channel, with the
push representing how much we'd later moved to the peer.
For lease_fees we were rerporting the total in the channel, with the
push representing how much was already moved to the peer.
We fix this (from a view perspective) by re-adding lease fees to what's
reported in the channel funding totals. Since this is now new behavior
(for leased channel values), we added new fields so we can take the old
field names thru a deprecation cycle.
We also make it possible to differentiate btw a push and a lease_fee
(before they were all the same), by adding to new fields to `listpeers`:
`fee_paid_msat` and `fee_rcvd_msat`.
This allows us to avoid math in the bookkeeper, instead we just pick
the numbers out directly and record them.
Fixes#5472
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `listpeers` now has a few new fields for `funding` (`remote_funds_msat`, `local_funds_msat`, `fee_paid_msat`, `fee_rcvd_msat`).
Changelog-Deprecated: JSON-RPC: `listpeers`.`funded` fields `local_msat` and `remote_msat` are now deprecated.
```
# 0x0100 = channel_announcement
# 0x0102 = channel_update
# (Node announcement may have any timestamp)
types = Counter([m[0:4] for m in msgs])
assert types['0100'] == 1
> assert types['0102'] == 2
E assert 1 == 2
tests/test_gossip.py:324: AssertionError
```
Examining the logs shows that we ask l4 for timestamps
"first_timestamp=1658892115 timestamp_range=13", and the timestamp on
the missing update is exactly `1658892128`.
So round the end time up by 1 for filtering.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We used to tell connectd to remember our connect delay, and hand it
back (increased if necessary).
Instead, simply record when we last tried to connect. If it was less
than 10 minutes ago, double delay (up to 5 minutes max), otherwise
reset delay to 1 second.
This covers all scenarios: whether we reconnect then immediately
disconnect, or never successfully connect, it doesn't matter.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fixes: #5453
Keep the accounts as an 'append only' log, instead we move the marker
for the 'channel_open' forward when a 'channel_open' comes out.
We also neatly hide the 'channel_proposed' events in 'inspect' if
there's a 'channel_open' for that same event.
If you call inspect before the 'channel_open' is confirmed, you'll see
the tag as 'channel_proposed', afterwards it shows up as
'channel_open'. However the event log rolls forward -- listaccountevents
will show the correct history of the proposal then open confirming (plus
any routing that happened before the channel confirmed).
We need a record of the channel account before you start sending
payments through it. Normally we don't start allowing payments to be
sent until after the channel has locked in but zeroconf does away with
this assumption.
Instead we push out a "channel_proposed" event, which should only show
up for zeroconfs.
First off, when we pull data out of JSON, unescape it so we don't end up
with extraneous escapes in our bookkeeping data. I promise, it's worth
it.
Then, when we print descriptions out to the csvs, we gotta wrap
everything in quotes... but also we have to change all the double-quotes
to singles so that adding the quotes doesn't do anything untoward.
We also just pass it thru json_escape to get rid of linebreaks etc.
Note that in the tests we do a byte comparison instead of converting the
CSV dumps to strings because python will escape the strings on
conversion...
So we print out invoice fees on the same line for those CSVs! This means
we have to do a little bit of gymnastics (but not too bad):
- we save the fee amount onto the income event now so we can use
it later
- we ignore every "invoice_fee" event for the koinly/cointracker
Note that since we're not skipping income events in the loops we also
move the newline character to the start of every `_entry` function so
skipped records dont incur empth lines.
Changelog-Added: bkpr: print out invoice fees on the same line for `koinly` and `cointracker` csv types
If we expect further events for an onchain output (because we can steal
it away from the 'external'/rightful owner), we mark them.
This prevents us from marking a channel as 'onchain-resolved' before
all events that we're interested in have actually hit the chain.
Case that this matters:
Peer publishes a (cheating) unilateral close and a timeout htlc (which
we can steal).
We then steal the timeout htlc.
W/o the stealable flag, we'd have marked the channel as resolved when
the peer published the timeout htlc, which is incorrect as we're still
waiting for the resolution of that timeout htlc (b/c we *can* steal it).
We were failing to mark channels as resolved b/c we weren't using later
events to external (but originated from this account) events as signals
to run the channel resolution check.
This fixes that, and adds a test.
Adds schema definitions and manpages for bkpr- commands; also renames
the commands to all start with 'bkpr-', so they're easier to identify/
make runes about.
Anchor outputs are ignored by the clightning wallet, but we keep track
of them in the bookkeeper. This causes problems when we do the balance
checks on restart w/ the balance_snapshot -- it results in us printing
out a journal_entry to 'get rid of' the anchors that the clightning node
doesnt know about.
Instead, we mark some outputs as 'ignored' and exclude these from our
account balance sums when we're comparing to the clightning snapshot.
For income events, break out the amount paid in routing fees vs the
total amount of the *invoice* that is paid.
Also printout these fees, when available, on listaccountevents
This is a rare case where we RBF the output of a penalty until it no
longer has an output value we can reclaim. We ignore the txid for these
events when closing a channel.
We issue events for external deposits (withdrawals) before the tx is
confirmed in a block. To avoid double counting these, we don't count
them as confirmed/included until after they're confirmed. We do this
by keeping the blockheight as zero until the withdraw for the input for
them comes through.
Note that since we don't have any way to note when RBF'd withdraws
aren't eligible for block inclusion anymore, we don't really have a good
heuristic to trim them. Which is fine, they *will* show up in account
events however.
onchain fees are weird at channel close because:
- you may be missing an trimmed htlc (which went to fees)
- the balance from close may have been rounded (msats cant land on
chain)
- the close might have been a past state and you've actually
ended up with more money onchain than you had in the channel. wut
This commit accounts for all of this appropriately, with some tests.
channel_close.debit should equal onchain_fee.credit (for that txid)
plus sum(chain_event.credit [wallet/channel_acct]).
In the penalty case, channel_close.debit becomes channel_close.debit +
penalty_adj.debit, i.e.
channel-close.debit + (penalty_adj.debit) =
onchain_fee.credit
+ sum(chain_event.credit [wallet/channel_acct])
We might only have seen one side of the channel, as shown below. Wait
for both:
```
_____________________________ test_wumbo_channels ______________________________
[gw2] linux -- Python 3.7.13 /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.7.13/x64/bin/python3
node_factory = <pyln.testing.utils.NodeFactory object at 0x7f5d51743b10>
bitcoind = <pyln.testing.utils.BitcoinD object at 0x7f5d51699d10>
@pytest.mark.openchannel('v1')
@pytest.mark.openchannel('v2')
def test_wumbo_channels(node_factory, bitcoind):
l1, l2, l3 = node_factory.get_nodes(3,
opts=[{'large-channels': None},
{'large-channels': None},
{}])
conn = l1.rpc.connect(l2.info['id'], 'localhost', port=l2.port)
expected_features = expected_peer_features(wumbo_channels=True)
if l1.config('experimental-dual-fund'):
expected_features = expected_peer_features(wumbo_channels=True,
extra=[21, 29])
assert conn['features'] == expected_features
assert only_one(l1.rpc.listpeers(l2.info['id'])['peers'])['features'] == expected_features
# Now, can we open a giant channel?
l1.fundwallet(1 << 26)
l1.rpc.fundchannel(l2.info['id'], 1 << 24)
# Get that mined, and announced.
bitcoind.generate_block(6, wait_for_mempool=1)
# Connect l3, get gossip.
l3.rpc.connect(l1.info['id'], 'localhost', port=l1.port)
wait_for(lambda: len(l3.rpc.listnodes(l1.info['id'])['nodes']) == 1)
wait_for(lambda: 'features' in only_one(l3.rpc.listnodes(l1.info['id'])['nodes']))
# Make sure channel capacity is what we expected.
> assert ([c['amount_msat'] for c in l3.rpc.listchannels()['channels']]
== [Millisatoshi(str(1 << 24) + "sat")] * 2)
E assert [16777216000msat] == [16777216000m...777216000msat]
E Right contains one more item: 16777216000msat
E Full diff:
E - [16777216000msat, 16777216000msat]
E + [16777216000msat]
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There's a race btw disconnecting and returning a successful RPC call for
openchannel_signed; if we disconnect quickly, we get an RPC error back.
Too slow and it returns w/o an error.
This needs to be cleaned up on a whole, work that I'm planning to get
into as part of a funder re-write. For now, let's just let the test
continue whether this call succeeds or fails.
We reset counters every minute, so ratelimit tests can flake since we
might hit that boundary.
Instead, wait for the reset then test explicitly, assuming that takes
less than 60 seconds.
```
for rune, cmd, params in failures:
print("{} {}".format(cmd, params))
with pytest.raises(RpcError, match='Not authorized:') as exc_info:
l2.rpc.call(method='commando',
payload={'peer_id': l1.info['id'],
'rune': rune['rune'],
'method': cmd,
> 'params': params})
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'pyln.client.lightning.RpcError'>
...
DEBUG:root:Calling commando with payload {'peer_id': '0266e4598d1d3c415f572a8488830b60f7e744ed9235eb0b1ba93283b315c03518', 'rune': 'O8Zr-ULTBKO3_pKYz0QKE9xYl1vQ4Xx9PtlHuist9Rk9NCZwbnVtPTAmcmF0ZT0zJnJhdGU9MQ==', 'method': 'getinfo', 'params': {}}
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Alex Myers
adi2011
Christian Decker
niftynei
Ken Sedgwick
Rusty Russell