Since we didn't hash the descriptions properly (see previous commit), we
cannot immediately deprecate omitting the descriptions (since you'd
have to omit them for backwards compat!).
And move the "must have description or hash" test into bolt11.c core.
Changelog-Deprecated: `pay` has *undeprecated* paying a description-hash invoice without providing the description.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means we need to push off requring this for another full deprecation cycle!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: JSON-RPC: `pay` and `decodepay` with description now correctly handle JSON escapes (e.g " inside description)
This is a minimal subset of the master commit b8aa3a579e
which fixes compile with --enable-experimental-features:
```
wallet/walletrpc.c: In function 'json_transaction_details':
wallet/walletrpc.c:521:56: error: 'const struct wallet_transaction' has no member named 'input_annotations'
521 | struct tx_annotation *ann = &tx->input_annotations[i];
| ^~
wallet/walletrpc.c:551:56: error: 'const struct wallet_transaction' has no member named 'output_annotations'
551 | struct tx_annotation *ann = &tx->output_annotations[i];
| ^~
```
Reported-by: @whitslack
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: build: compilation error when `--enable-experimental-features` configured.
Avoids failing the test with the pip warning:
WARNING: Running pip as the 'root' user can result in broken permissions and conflicting behaviour with the system package manager. It is recommended to use a virtual environment instead: https://pip.pypa.io/warnings/venv
reported by: @ksedgwic
Changelog-None
This was pointed out by Daywalker [1]: we are synchronously processing
events from `lightningd` which means that if processing one of the
hooks or requests was slow or delayed, we would not get notifications,
hooks, or RPC requests, massively impacting the flexbility.
This highlights the issue with a failing test (it times out), and in
the next commit we will isolate event processing into their own task,
so to free the event loop from having to wait for an eventual
response.
[1] https://community.corelightning.org/c/developers/hold-invoice-plugin#comment_wrapper_16754493
This was previously the role of connectd, but it's actually more
efficient for us to do it: connectd has to sweep through the entire
gossip_store, but we have datastructures for this already.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were in fact feeding l1 its own gossip, which it doesn't ratelimit (this was
a bit fuzzy before, but definitely is the case now!).
So make this node actually l3, so we test what we expected to test.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This test makes l2 save db, make a payment, then rollback.
*Sometimes* under CI (but not here) we don't shutdown fast enough
after the payment, so the moves.json from the coin_movements.py
records it. Sure enough, the result is the node ends up with
a -10000msat balance.
Validated by putting a time.sleep(5) between:
```
l2.rpc.pay(inv['bolt11'])
import time
time.sleep(5)
# stop both nodes, roll back l2's database
```
The answer, of course, is to save and rollback *both* the db and
moves.json file.
Here's the error:
```
def test_penalty_htlc_tx_timeout(node_factory, bitcoind, chainparams):
...
assert account_balance(l3, channel_id) == 0
> assert account_balance(l2, channel_id) == 0
tests/test_closing.py:1527:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
tests/utils.py:184: in account_balance
m_sum -= Millisatoshi(m['debit_msat'])
contrib/pyln-client/pyln/client/lightning.py:197: in __sub__
return Millisatoshi(int(self) - int(other))
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
self = -10000msat, v = -10000
...
if self.millisatoshis < 0:
> raise ValueError("Millisatoshi must be >= 0")
E ValueError: Millisatoshi must be >= 0
contrib/pyln-client/pyln/client/lightning.py:82: ValueError
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to wait until we're sure bcli has handed results to lightningd:
```
> assert feerates['perkw']['mutual_close'] == 5000
E assert 6250 == 5000
tests/test_misc.py:1617: AssertionError
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
You still need to actually make a rune when lightningd starts, as
commando (for safety) won't work unless you actually generate a rune
(that it knows of!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: hsmtool: `makerune` command to make a master rune for a node.
Now we've set everything up, the replacement code is quite simple.
Some tests now have to deal with RBF though, and our rbf tests need work
since they look for the old onchaind messages.
In particular, when we can't afford the fee we want, we back off to
the next blockcount estimate, rather than spending all on fees
(necessarily). So test_penalty_rbf_burn no longer applies.
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: spending unilateral close transactions now use dynamic fees based on deadlines (and RBF), instead of fixed fees.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `feerates`: added `floor` field for current minimum feerate bitcoind will accept
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fixes: #4473
Changelog-Deprecated: Plugins: `estimatefees` returning feerates by name (e.g. "opening"); use `fee_floor` and `feerates`.
Changelog-Fixed: Plugins: `bcli` now tells us the minimal possible feerate, such as with mempool congestion, rather than assuming 1 sat/vbyte.
Changelog-Added: Plugins: `estimatefees` can return explicit `fee_floor` and `feerates` by block number.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And consolidate descriptions into lightning-feerates().
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `close`, `fundchannel`, `fundpsbt`, `multifundchannel`, `multiwithdraw`, `txprepare`, `upgradewallet`, `withdraw` now allow "minimum" and NN"blocks" as `feerate` (`feerange` for `close`).
Drop try_get_feerate() in favor of explicit feerate_for_deadline() and
smoothed_feerate_for_deadline().
This shows us everywhere we deal with old-style feerates by names.
`delayed_to_us` and `htlc_resolution` will be moving to dynamic fees,
so deprecate those.
Note that "penalty" is still used for generating penalty txs for
watchtowers, and "unilateral_close" still used until we get zero-fee
anchors.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `feerates` `estimates` array shows fee estimates by blockcount from underlying plugin (usually *bcli*).
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: `close`, `fundchannel`, `fundpsbt`, `multifundchannel`, `multiwithdraw`, `txprepare`, `upgradewallet`, `withdraw` `feerate` (`feerange` for `close`) value *slow* is now 100 block-estimate, not half of 100-block estimate.
Changelog-Deprecated: JSON-RPC: `close`, `fundchannel`, `fundpsbt`, `multifundchannel`, `multiwithdraw`, `txprepare`, `upgradewallet`, `withdraw` `feerate` (`feerange` for `close`) expressed as, "delayed_to_us", "htlc_resolution", "max_acceptable" or "min_acceptable". Use explicit block counts or *slow*/*normal*/*urgent*/*minimum*.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rather than have specific-purpose levels, have an array of
[blockcount, feerate], and rebuild the specific-purpose levels
for now on top.
We also keep a *separate* smoothed feerate, so you can ask for that
explicitly.
Since all the plugins used the same formula to derive the different
named fee levels, we apply the reverse to return to the underlying
estimates: updating the interface comes next.
This is ugly for now, but various specific-purpose levels will be
going away, as we shift to deadline-driven fees.
This temporarily breaks the floor calculation, so that test is
disabled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we're messing with feerates, it's good to test this directly upfront.
Also, fix documentation!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Turns out the two bcli replacements I checked (`sauron` and
`trustedcoin`) don't even implement this, and the multiplier makes
more sense in lightningd, especially as we move to bcli just providing
raw feerate estimates.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These corpora were generated with default libFuzzer flags with 30+ hours
of CPU time, and then minimized with:
./fuzz-TARGET -merge=1 -shuffle=0 -prefer_small=1 -use_value_profile=1 corpora/fuzz-TARGET UNMINIMIZED_CORPUS
In particular:
- Bolt 4: add route blinding construction
- Bolt 4: add blinded payments
And this means it's not experimental, so we can turn it on
by default!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: Protocol: blinded payments are now supported by default (not just with `--experimental-onion-messages`)
Inside our integration testing we get another timeout,
so this commit adds a timeout to the waitpay command to avoid waiting forever.
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
We do this for HTLCs which will timeout to them: we watch them in case we
want to fulfill them as a preimage comes in, but once they reach depth we
can forget about them.
We change the message, which causes some more test churn.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Using single tuples in Python is ugly, so:
1. Rename wait_for_onchaind_tx to wait_for_onchaind_txs.
2. Make it take tuples explicitly.
3. Make wait_for_onchaind_tx a simpler wrapper/unwrapper.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is when they closed the channel, we can simply make our own tx to
expire the HTLC. (The other case is where we closed the channel, and
we have a special htlc_timeout tx which we have their signature for).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This breaks tests/test_closing.py::test_onchain_all_dust's accouting
checks.
That test doesn't really test what it claims to test; sure, onchaind
*says* it's going to ignore the output due to high fees, but the tx
still gets mined.
I cannot figure out what the test is supposed to look like, so I
simply disabled the accounting checks :(
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Importantly, the code in jsonrpc.c which actually does the io_break:
```
/* Once the stop_conn conn is drained, we can shut down. */
if (jcon->ld->stop_conn == conn && jcon->ld->state == LD_STATE_RUNNING) {
/* Return us to toplevel lightningd.c */
log_debug(jcon->ld->log, "io_break: %s", __func__);
io_break(jcon->ld);
```
By having the state not set until later, we avoid running this. Of course,
we need to avoid calling the main loop when we get there, if we've already
been told to shutdown.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In CI we see crashes in this case:
```
lightningd: lightningd/connect_control.c:734: void connectd_activate(struct lightningd *): Assertion `ret == ld->connectd' failed.
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
CI seems to block; Christian suggests the throttler may be to blame somehow?
Since trying to fix it made it worse, let's just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We always call channel_fail_transient() on all channels when a peer
connects, to clean up any previous connections. However, when
we startup, this channel doesn't have an owner yet, resulting in
a fairly weird INFO level message.
Reported-by: Michael Schmook @mschmook
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: `lightningd`: don't log gratuitous "Peer transient failure" message on first connection after restart.
There are cases (difficult to reproduce with a test) where
a payment will fail one time and succeed later.
As far I understand in this case the groupid field of the payment
is the same, and the only thing that change is the status, so
our logic inside the delpay is ambiguous where it is not
possible to delete a payment as described in https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/6114
A sequence of commands that explain the problem is
```
$ lc -k listpays payment_hash=H
{
"pays": [
{
"bolt11": "I",
"destination": "redacted",
"payment_hash": "H",
"status": "complete",
"created_at": redacted,
"completed_at": redacted,
"preimage": "P",
"amount_msat": "redacted",
"amount_sent_msat": "redacted"
}
]
}
$ lc delpay H complete
{
"code": 211,
"message": "Payment with hash H has failed status but it should be complete"
}
```
In this case, the delpay is not able to delete a payment because the
listpays is returning only the succeeded one, so by running the
listsendpays we may see the following result where our delpay logic
will be stuck because it works to ensure that all the payments stored
in the database has the status specified by the user
```
➜ VincentSSD clightning --testnet listsendpays -k payment_hash=7fc74bedbb78f2f3330155d919a54e730cf19c11bc73e96c027f5cd4a34e53f4
{
"payments": [
{
"id": 322,
"payment_hash": "7fc74bedbb78f2f3330155d919a54e730cf19c11bc73e96c027f5cd4a34e53f4",
"groupid": 1,
"partid": 1,
"destination": "030b686a163aa2bba03cebb8bab7778fac251536498141df0a436d688352d426f6",
"amount_msat": 300,
"amount_sent_msat": 1664,
"created_at": 1679510203,
"completed_at": 1679510205,
"status": "failed",
"bolt11": "lntb1pjpkj4xsp52trda39rfpe7qtqahx8jjplhnj3tatxy8rh6sc6afgvmdz7n0llspp50lr5hmdm0re0xvcp2hv3nf2wwvx0r8q3h3e7jmqz0awdfg6w206qdp0w3jhxarfdenjqargv5sxgetvwpshjgrzw4njqun9wphhyaqxqyjw5qcqp2rzjqtp28uqy77te96ylt7ek703h4ayldljsf8rnlztgf3p8mg7pd0qzwf8a3yqqpdqqqyqqqqt2qqqqqqgqqc9qxpqysgqgeya2lguaj6sflc4hx2d89jvah8mw9uax4j77d8rzkut3rkm0554x37fc7gy92ws9l76yprdva2lalrs7fqjp9lcx40zuty8gca0g5spme3dup"
},
{
"id": 323,
"payment_hash": "7fc74bedbb78f2f3330155d919a54e730cf19c11bc73e96c027f5cd4a34e53f4",
"groupid": 1,
"partid": 2,
"destination": "030b686a163aa2bba03cebb8bab7778fac251536498141df0a436d688352d426f6",
"amount_msat": 300,
"amount_sent_msat": 3663,
"created_at": 1679510205,
"completed_at": 1679510207,
"status": "failed"
},
{
"id": 324,
"payment_hash": "7fc74bedbb78f2f3330155d919a54e730cf19c11bc73e96c027f5cd4a34e53f4",
"groupid": 1,
"partid": 3,
"destination": "030b686a163aa2bba03cebb8bab7778fac251536498141df0a436d688352d426f6",
"amount_msat": 300,
"amount_sent_msat": 3663,
"created_at": 1679510207,
"completed_at": 1679510209,
"status": "failed"
},
{
"id": 325,
"payment_hash": "7fc74bedbb78f2f3330155d919a54e730cf19c11bc73e96c027f5cd4a34e53f4",
"groupid": 1,
"partid": 4,
"destination": "030b686a163aa2bba03cebb8bab7778fac251536498141df0a436d688352d426f6",
"amount_msat": 300,
"amount_sent_msat": 4663,
"created_at": 1679510209,
"completed_at": 1679510221,
"status": "complete",
"payment_preimage": "43f746f2d28d4902489cbde9b3b8f3d04db5db7e973f8a55b7229ce774bf33a7"
}
]
}
```
This commit solves the problem by forcing the delete query in the
database to specify status too, and work around this kind of
ambiguous case.
Fixes: f52ff07558 (lightningd: allow delpay to delete a specific payment.)
Reported-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
Link: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/6114
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Co-Developed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: delpay be more pedantic about delete logic by allowing
delete payments by status directly on the database.
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
Alex Myers
Matt Morehouse
Vincenzo Palazzo
Michael Schmoock