Tests that will only run when !EXPERIMENTAL_DUAL_FUND:
@pytest.marker.openchannel('v1')
def test_...()
Tests that will only run when EXPERIMENTAL_DUAL_FUND:
@pytest.marker.openchannel('v2')
def test_...()
Users are more upset recently with the cost of unilateral closes
than they are the risk of being cheated. While we complete our
anchor implementation so we can use low fees there, let's
get less aggressive (we already have 34 or 18 blocks to close
in the worst case).
The changes are:
- Commit transactions were "2 CONSERVATIVE" now "6 ECONOMICAL".
- HTLC resolution txs were "3 CONSERVATIVE" now "6 ECONOMICAL".
- Penalty txs were "3 CONSERVATIVE" now "12 ECONOMICAL".
- Normal txs were "4 ECONOMICAL" now "12 ECONOMICAL".
There can be no perfect levels, but we have had understandable
complaints recently about how high our default fee levels are.
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: channel feerates reduced to bitcoind's "6 block ECONOMICAL" rate.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
You can now activate dual-funded channels using the
`--experimental-dual-fund` flag
Changelog-Changed: Config: `--experimental-dual-fund` runtime flag will enable dual-funded protocol on this node
Otherwise, we might find an address other than the one given and
the user might think that address worked.
Fixes: #4185
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `connect` returns `address` it actually connected to
And update all the in-tree callers.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Deprecated: JSON-RPC: `fundchannel_complete` `txid` and `txout` parameters (use `psbt`)
Users have no idea what they would pay for unilateral closes.
At least this gives them a clue!
Reported-by: @az0re on IRC.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `listpeers` now shows latest feerate and unilaral close fee.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
They need to specify fees to get a channel before this, but it's possible.
The test revealed no surprises (other than the last change).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Saves a great deal of confusion for regtest users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: If bitcoind won't give a fee estimate in regtest, use minimum.
Nested `with` exception checks don't work; fix flakes i'm seeing with
valgrind causing failures because blockchain not up to date when
`fundchannel` called.
It was using a trick to only shut down the first node, and forgetting
about the others. This could lead to processes not being stopped
correctly and to test failures because the directory isn't cleaned up
correctly.
Now we use the executor to shut as many nodes as possible in parallel.
Since we turned many errors into warnings, we want our tests to fail
when they happen unexpectedly. We make WARNING clear in the strings
we print, too, to help out.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And make all the callers choose which one. In general, I prefer warn,
which lets them reconnect and try again, however some places are either
stated that they must be errors in the spec itself, or in openingd
where we abandon the channel when we close the connection anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: we now send warning messages and close the connection, except on unrecoverable errors.
If we're quick (or the node is slow) we end up reconnecting before our
counterparty has realized the state transition, resulting in an
unexpected re-establish.
There's a case where a dropped funding_locked will result in the peer
moving onto channeld, while we stay in dualopend. As we haven't
received their funding_locked, we retransmit tx_sigs, which channeld
will need to handle.
With the patch the peer drops it on the floor; the peer will resend
funding_locked on reconnect, which will correctly advance us to
channeld and CHANNELD_NORMAL
If we're already attempting to connect to a peer, we would ignore
new connection requests. This is problematic if your node has bad
connection details for the node -- you can't update it while inflight.
This patch appends new connection suggestions to the list of connections
to try.
Fixes#4154
Since `fundchannel` now supports the 'close_to' argument, we can remove
all the logic needed to call fundchannel_start here.
Underneath, we're still calling `fundchannel_start`, we're just one (or
two, if you count multifundchannel) call levels away from it now.
We had one report of this, and then Eugene and Roasbeef of Lightning
Labs confirmed it; they saw misordered HTLCs on reconnection too.
Since we didn't enforce this when we receive HTLCs, we never noticed :(
Fixes: #3920
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: Protocol: fixed retransmission order of multiple new HTLCs (causing channel close with LND)
We didn't care, but other implementations (particularly lnd) do. And it
does violate the spec.
(We need to use skip not xfail on the test which catches this, since
xfail doesn't seem to stop errors reported by cleanup)
(Includes Christian's typo fix!)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Marking spent means if the transaction doesn't confirm for some
reason, the user will need to force a rescan to find the funds. Now
we have timed reservations, reserving for (an additional) 12 hours
should be sufficient.
We also take this opportunity (now we have our own callback path)
to record the tx in the wallet only on success.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Some minor phrasing differences cause test changes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: txprepare reservations stay across restarts: use fundpsbt/reservepsbt/unreservepsbt
Changelog-Removed: txprepare `destination` `satoshi` argument form removed (deprecated v0.7.3)
With a feerate of 7500perkw and subtracting 660 sats for anchors, a
20,000 sat channel has capacity about 9800 sat, below our default:
You gave bad parameters: channel capacity with funding 20000sat, reserves 546sat/546sat, max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat is 18446744073709551615msat, channel capacity is 9818sat, which is below 10000000msat
So bump channel amounts.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And document exactly what it does: insist that an HTLC can pass of
this value (module assumptions of feerate).
Note that we remove the "is_opener" test from the capacity calculation
for anchor fees: it doesn't matter which side it is, someone has to pay
for anchor fees to it deducts from capacity.
This change breaks the test, which we rewrite.
Changelog-Changed: config: `min-capacity-sat` is now stricter about checking usable capacity of channels.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's actually not possible to currently tell if you're using anchor_outputs
with a peer (since it depends on whether you both supported it at *channel open*).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-added: JSON-RPC: `listpeers` shows `features` list for each channel.
Anchor outputs break many assumptions in our tests:
1. Remove some hardcoded numbers in favor of a fee calc, so we only have to
change in one place.
FIXME: This should also be done for elements!
2. Do binary search to get feerate for a given closing fee.
3. Don't assume output #0: anchor outputs perturb them.
4. Don't assume we can make 1ksat channels (anchors cost 660 sats!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
And when it's set, and we're SLOW_MACHINE, simply disable valgrind.
Since Travis (SLOW_MACHINE=1) only does VALGRIND=1 DEVELOPER=1 tests,
and VALGRIND=0 DEVELOPER=0 tests, it was missing tests which needed
DEVELOPER and !VALGRIND.
Instead, this demotes them to non-valgrind tests for SLOW_MACHINEs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I started replacing all get_node() calls, but got bored, so then just did the
tests which call get_node() 3 times or more.
Ends up not making a measurable speed difference, but it does make some
things neater and more standard.
Times with SLOW_MACHINE=1 (given that's how Travis tests):
Time before (non-valgrind):
393 sec (had 3 failures?)
Time after (non-valgrind):
410 sec
Time before (valgrind):
890 seconds (had 2 failures)
Time after (valgrind):
892 sec
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I thought this was timing out because I made it slow with the
change to txprepare as a plugin. In fact, it was timing out
because sometimes gossip comes so fast it gets suppressed
and we never get the log messags.
Still, before this it took 98 seconds under valgrind and
24 under non-valgrind, so it's an improvement to time as
well as robustness.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: `fundchannel_cancel` will now succeed even when executed while a `fundchannel_complete` is ongoing; in that case, it will be considered as cancelling the funding *after* the `fundchannel_complete` succeeds.
Let me introduce the concept of "Sequential Consistency":
All operations on parallel processes form a single total order agreed upon by all processes.
So for example, suppose we have parallel invocations of `fundchannel_complete` and `fundchannel_cancel`:
+--[fundchannel_complete]-->
|
--[fundchannel_start]-+
|
+--[fundchannel_cancel]---->
What "Sequential Consistency" means is that the above parallel operations can be serialized as a single total order as:
--[fundchannel_start]--[fundchannel_complete]--[fundchannel_cancel]-->
Or:
--[fundchannel_start]--[fundchannel_cancel]--[fundchannel_complete]-->
In the first case, `fundchannel_complete` succeeds, and the `fundchannel_cancel` invocation also succeeds, sending an `error` to the peer to make them forget the chanel.
In the second case, `fundchannel_cancel` succeeds, and the succeeding `fundchannel_complete` invocation fails, since the funding is already cancelled and there is nothing to complete.
Note that in both cases, `fundchannel_cancel` **always** succeeds.
Unfortunately, prior to this commit, `fundchannel_cancel` could fail with a `Try fundchannel_cancel again` error if the `fundchannel_complete` is ongoing when the `fundchannel_cancel` is initiated.
This violates Sequential Consistency, as there is no single total order that would have caused `fundchannel_cancel` to fail.
This commit is a minimal patch which just reschedules `fundchannel_cancel` to occur after any `fundchannel_complete` that is ongoing.
I noticed the following in logs for tests/test_connection.py::test_feerate_stress:
```
DEBUG 022d223620a359a47ff7f7ac447c85c46c923da53389221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-chan#1: Failing HTLC 18446744073709551615 due to peer death
DEBUG 022d223620a359a47ff7f7ac447c85c46c923da53389221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-chan#1: local_routing_failure: 8194 (WIRE_TEMPORARY_NODE_FAILURE)
```
This is because it reports the (transient) node_failure error, because
our channel_failure message is incomplete. Fix this wart up.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
niftynei
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
Michael Schmoock
ZmnSCPxj jxPCSnmZ
Jan Sarenik