This is the source of failure in the test_restart_many_payments stress
test: we don't commit the outgoing HTLC immediately, instead waiting for
gossip to tell us the peer for the outgoing channel, then waiting for
that channeld to tell is it's committed. The result was incoming HTLCs
with no outgoing.
I initially pushed the HTLCs through that same path, but of course
(since peers are not connected yet!) the only result was that we failed
these HTLCs immediately. So I chose the far simpler course of just
failing them directly.
To reproduce this, I had to increase the test_restart_many_payments
num to 10, and run it with nice -20 taskset -c 0.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Noted by @cdecker, the term 'local' is grossly overused, and the hout
preimage is basically only used as a sanity check (though I've just put
a FIXME there for now).
Also eliminated spurious blank line which crept into wallet.c.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't expect payment or payment->route_channels to be NULL without an
old db, but putting an assert there reveals that we try to fail an HTLC
which has already succeeded in 'test_onchain_unwatch'.
Obviously we only want to fail an HTLC which goes onchain if we don't
already have the preimage!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
failoutchannel tells us which channel to send an update for (specifically
for temporary_channel_failure); but we don't save it into the db. It's
not even clear we should, since it's a corner case and the channel might
not even exist when we come back.
So on db restore, change such errors to WIRE_TEMPORARY_NODE_FAILURE
which doesn't need an update.
We also don't memset it to 0 in the normal case (we only access if it
failcode has the UPDATE bit set) so valgrind will trigger if we're
wrong.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't save them to the database, so fix things up as we load them.
Next patch will actually save them into the db, and this will become
COMPAT code.
Also: call htlc_in_check() with NULL on db load, as otherwise it aborts
internally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This means we need to check when we've altered the state, so the checks
are moved to the callers of htlc_in_update_state and htlc_out_update_state.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We do this a lot, and had boutique helpers in various places. So add
a more generic one; for convenience it returns a pointer to the new
end element.
I prefer the name tal_arr_expand to tal_arr_append, since it's up to
the caller to populate the new array entry.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is a noop if we're opening a new channel (channel_fees_can_change(channel)
is false until funding locked in), but important if we're restarting.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. l1 update_fee -> l2
2. l1 commitment_signed -> l2 (using new feerate)
3. l1 <- revoke_and_ack l2
4. l1 <- commitment_signed l2 (using new feerate)
5. l1 -> revoke_and_ack l2
When we break the connection after #3, the reconnection causes #4 to
be retransmitted, but it turns out l1 wasn't telling the master to set
the local feerate until it received the commitment_signed, so on
reconnect it uses the old feerate, with predictable results (bad
signature).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. connect convenience variable for improved readabilty.
2. a comment explaining that timer is on channel, not HTLC.
3. use modern python style in test_htlc_send_timeout
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
tal_count() is used where there's a type, even if it's char or u8, and
tal_bytelen() is going to replace tal_len() for clarity: it's only needed
where a pointer is void.
We shim tal_bytelen() for now.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This seems like a premature optimization: it tried to cut down the number of
allocations by reusing the same `struct invoice_details` while iterating through
a number of results. But this sidesteps the checks by `valgrind` and we'd miss a
missing field that was set by the previous iteration.
Reported-by: @rustyrussell
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
We use these for receiving arrays at init time, we should also use them
for fulfull/fail of HTLCs in normal operation. That we we benefit from all
those assertions.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The master tells us the short_channel_id of the outgoing channel when
failing an HTLC, but channeld didn't store it anywhere. It also
didn't tell channeld the short_channel_id in the case where we're
reconnecting and it's feeding us an array of failed htlcs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Removed `json_get_params`.
Also added json_tok_percent and json_tok_newaddr. Probably should
have been a separate PR but it was so easy.
[ Squashed comment update for gcc workaround --RR ]
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
Well, it's generated by shachain, so technically it is a sha256, but
that's an internal detail. It's a secret.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I'm not completely convinced that it's only ever set to a failcode
with the BADONION bit set, especially after the previous patches in
this series. Now that channeld can handle arbitrary failcodes passed
this way, simply rename it.
We add marshalling assertions that only one of failcode and failreason
is set, and we unmarshal an empty 'fail' to NULL (just the the
generated unmarshalling code does).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
==1224== Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
==1224== at 0x152CAD: memcheck_ (mem.h:247)
==1224== by 0x152D18: towire (towire.c:17)
==1224== by 0x152DA1: towire_u16 (towire.c:28)
==1224== by 0x142189: towire_failed_htlc (htlc_wire.c:29)
==1224== by 0x16343F: towire_channel_init (gen_channel_wire.c:596)
==1224== by 0x115C2C: peer_start_channeld (channel_control.c:249)
==1224== by 0x131701: peer_connected (peer_control.c:503)
==1224== by 0x117820: gossip_msg (gossip_control.c:182)
==1224== by 0x139D97: sd_msg_read (subd.c:500)
==1224== by 0x139676: read_fds (subd.c:327)
==1224== by 0x179D52: next_plan (io.c:59)
==1224== by 0x17A84F: do_plan (io.c:387)
==1224== Address 0x1ffefffabe is on thread 1's stack
==1224== in frame #2, created by towire_u16 (towire.c:26)
Followed by:
2018-06-18T21:53:04.129Z lightningd(1224): 03933884aaf1d6b108397e5efe5c86bcf2d8ca8d2f700eda99db9214fc2712b134 chan #1: Peer permanent failure in CHANNELD_NORMAL: lightning_channeld: received ERROR channel d0101486543e1a8b6871556a4fe1fba4ad4d83ce7f6f92919fd17bd1545d2fd5: UpdateFailMalformedHtlc message doesn't have BADONION bit set
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
structeq() is too dangerous: if a structure has padding, it can fail
silently.
The new ccan/structeq instead provides a macro to define foo_eq(),
which does the right thing in case of padding (which none of our
structures currently have anyway).
Upgrade ccan, and use it everywhere. Except run-peer-wire.c, which
is only testing code and can use raw memcmp(): valgrind will tell us
if padding exists.
Interestingly, we still declared short_channel_id_eq, even though
we didn't define it any more!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Until now, `command_fail()` reported an error code of -1 for all uses.
This PR adds an `int code` parameter to `command_fail()`, requiring the
caller to explicitly include the error code.
This is part of #1464.
The majority of the calls are used during parameter validation and
their error code is now JSONRPC2_INVALID_PARAMS.
The rest of the calls report an error code of LIGHTNINGD, which I defined to
-1 in `jsonrpc_errors.h`. The intention here is that as we improve our error
reporting, all occurenaces of LIGHTNINGD will go away and we can eventually
remove it.
I also converted calls to `command_fail_detailed()` that took a `NULL` `data`
parameter to use the new `command_fail()`.
The only difference from an end user perspecive is that bad input errors that
used to be -1 will now be -32602 (JSONRPC2_INVALID_PARAMS).
Because we have too many which are never used and I don't want to document
them.
1. Remove unused anchor_onchain_wait. When implemented, it should be
hardcoded to 100 or more.
2. Remove anchor_confirms_max. 10 always reasonable, and we can readd
an override option should someone need it.
3. max_htlc_expiry should be the same as locktime_max (which increases
from 3 to 5 days by default): they're both a limit on how long
funds can be locked up.
4. channel_update_interval should always be a dev option.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
So we know how much counterparty could theoretically steal from us
(msatoshi_to_us - msatoshi_to_us_min) and how much we could
theoretically steal from counterparty (msatoshi_to_us_max -
msatoshi_to_us).
For more piloting goodness.
If the source channel is onchain, we try to send a message to onchaind
which (1) doesn't care, (2) doesn't take a channel_fail_htlc msg, and
(3) causes us to crash in subd.c:
assert(!strstarts(sd->msgname(fromwire_peektype(msg_out)), "INVALID"));
Fixes: #821
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We always hand in "NULL" (which means use tal_len on the msg), except
for two places which do that manually for no good reason.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Mark Beckwith
Christian Decker
Mark Beckwith
ZmnSCPxj
practicalswift
Corné Plooy