We're not using the change_outnum for withdraw tx's (and the way
we were calculating it was broken as of the addition of 'multiple
outputs'). This removes the change output knowhow from withdraw_tx
entirely, and pushes the responsibility up to the caller to
include the change output in the output set if desired.
Consequently, we also remove the change output knowhow from hsmd.
Prior to this commit, passing a NULL stack to `bitcoin_tx_input_set_witness`
unsets the witness stack on the bitcoin_tx's wally_tx but leaves the
final witness on the PSBT unchanged.
at the moment, libwally's `wally_psbt_input_set_final_witness` will blow
up if you attempt to set a NULL witness -- instead we manually remove it
if the passed in stack is NULL. previously we would leave the PSBT's
witness unchanged.
Update the `bitcoin_tx_add_input` interface to accept a witness script
and or scriptPubkey.
We save the amount + witness script + witness program (if known) to
the PSBT object for a transaction when creating an input.
These are useful for tx_parts:
1. wally_txid.
2. linearize_wtx.
3. wally_tx_input_spends
4. wally_tx_output_get_amount
5. wally_tx_input_get_txid
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
now that witness script data is saved into the tx/psbt which is
serialized across the wire, there's no reason to use witscript to do
this. good bye witscript!
Move all psbt creation into single method, new_psbt
note that if a psbt is init'd for a transaction that's
deserialized with scripts etc already attached, then set_global_tx
will fail. instead, we empty all of this out first.
if the tx is being re-init'd from a tx source that had a psbt attached
(e.g. fromwire_) then the script/witness data will get populated
appropriatel from there.
If we fail to unmarshal the tx (shouldn't happen, but...) we must
not dereference NULL.
Also tighten the check: towire_ must send 0 or all inputs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We did this originally because these types are referred to in the bolts, and we
had no way of injecting the correct include lines into those. Now we do, so
there's less excuse for this.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Transactions that we 'get' from bitciond don't have the input values
available on the transaction; for these cases we'll sum up the inputs
amounts using a different data source than the transaction's
`input_amounts`. So we need to expose it here.
We roll the `elements_add_fee_output` function and the cropping of
overallocated arrays into the `bitcoin_tx_finalize` function. This is supposed
to be the final cleanup and compaction step before a tx can be sent to bitcoin
or passed off to other daemons.
This is the cleanup promised in #3491
This sets the nLockTime to the tip (and accordingly each input's nSequence to
0xfffffffe) for withdrawal transactions.
Even if the anti fee-sniping argument might not be valid until some time yet,
this makes our regular wallet transactions far less distinguishable from
bitcoind's ones since it now defaults to using native Segwit transactions
(like us). Moreover other wallets are likely to implement this (if they
haven't already).
Changelog-Added: wallet: withdrawal transactions now sets nlocktime to the current tip.
this is unnecessary, and actually severely limits the functionality
of `wally_tx_add_input`, which will expand the allocated input
length if there's not enough room for the additional input
```external/libwally-core/src/transaction.c
if (tx->num_inputs >= tx->inputs_allocation_len) {
/* Expand the inputs array */
struct wally_tx_input *p;
p = realloc_array(tx->inputs, tx->inputs_allocation_len,
tx->num_inputs + 1, sizeof(*tx->inputs));
...
tx->inputs = p;
tx->inputs_allocation_len += 1;
```
Currently the only source for amount_asset is the value getter on a tx output,
and we don't hand it too far around (mainly ignoring it if it isn't the
chain's main currency). Eventually we could bubble them up to the wallet, use
them to select outputs or actually support assets in the channels.
Since we don't hand them around too widely I thought it was ok for them to be
pass-by-value rather than having to allocate them and pass them around by
reference. They're just 41 bytes currently so the overhead should be ok.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
We now have a pointer to chainparams, that fails valgrind if we do anything
chain-specific before setting it.
Suggested-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
We used to match specifically on `is_elements && coinbase`, but we can just
hand off responsibility to libwally and then make sure we handle it correctly.
This is the main reason we started weaving the chainparams everywhere: being
able to compare the asset type with the fee paying asset tag, thus determining
the value of the asset correctly (we still treat any non-fee-paying assets as
having value 0).
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Especially when we grind fees we may end up setting the fees several times, so
instead of always adding a new fee output look for an existing one and set its
value.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We use to use the non-elements ones and then patch them manually. By using the
correct ones right from the start we have less work on our side.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
lisa neigut
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
Ken Sedgwick
darosior
Yash Bhutwala