We need the old remote per_commitment_point so we can validate the
per_commitment_secret when we get it.
We unify this housekeeping in the master daemon using
update_per_commit_point().
This patch also saves whether remote funding is locked, and disallows
doing that twice (channeld should ignore it).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's easiest to have the master keep the last commit we sent, for
re-transmission. We could recalculate it, but it's made more difficult
by the before/after revoke case.
And because revoke_and_ack changes the channel state, we need to
remember which order we sent them in for re-transmission.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need this for reestablishing a channel.
(Note: this patch changes quite a bit in this series, but reshuffling was
tedious).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Currently it's fairly ad-hoc, but we need to tell it to channeld when
it restarts, so we define it as the non-HTLC balance.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It needs to save them to the db in case of restart; this means we tell
it about funding_locked, as well as the next_per_commit_point given
in revoke_and_ack.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When adding their HTLCs, it needs all the information. When failing,
it needs the id as key and the failure reason. When fulfilling, it
needs the id and payment preimage.
It also needs to know when we have received an revoke_and_ack or a
commitment_signed, to place in the database.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We still get the shared secret, since that requires a round trip to the HSM
(why waste the master daemon's time?) but it does the processing, which
simplifies the message passing and things like realm handling which
have nothing to do with this particular channeld.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Some paths were still sending unencrypted failure messages; unify them
all. We need to keep the fail_msg around for resubmission if the
channeld dies; similarly, we need to keep the htlc_end structure
itself after failure, in case the failed HTLC is committed: we can
move it to a minimal archive once it's flushed from both sides,
however.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We used level -1 to mean "append to log", but that doesn't actually
work, and results in an assert if we try to prune the logs:
lightningd: daemon/pseudorand.c:36: pseudorand: Assertion `max' failed.
Expose logv_add and use that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use --log-level to control this, but we could add another switch.
It makes the test infrastructure simpler, since we can just look in the
main logs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I actually hit this very hard to reproduce race: if we haven't process
the channeld message when block #6 comes in, we won't send the gossip
message. We wait for logs, but don't generate new blocks, and timeout
on l1.daemon.wait_for_log('peer_out WIRE_ANNOUNCEMENT_SIGNATURES').
The solution, which also tests that we don't send announcement signatures
immediately, is to generate a single block, wait for CHANNELD_NORMAL,
then (in gossip tests), generate 5 more.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use this to make it send the funding_signed message, rather than having
the master daemon do it (which was even more hacky). It also means it
can handle the crypto, so no need for the packet to be handed up encrypted,
and also make --dev-disconnect "just work" for this packet.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is simpler than passing back and forth, for the moment at least. That
means we don't need to ask for a new one on reconnect.
This partially reverts the gossip handling in openingd, since it no longer
passes the gossip fd back. We also close it when peer is freed, so it
needs initializing to -1.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can go to release a gossip peer, and it can fail at the same time.
We work around the problem that the reply must be a gossipctl_release_peer_reply
with two fds, but it's not pretty.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We kill the existing connection if possible; this may mean simply
forgetting the prior peer altogether if it's in an early state.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead, send it the funding_signed message; it can watch, save to
database, and send it.
Now the openingd fundee path is a simple request and response, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Simplifies state machine. Master still has to calculate the tx to get
the signature and broadcast, but now the opening daemon funding path
is a simple request/response.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Like the fd, it's only useful when the peer is not in a daemon, so we
free & NULL it when that happens.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. We explicitly assert what state we're coming from, to make transitions
clearer.
2. Every transition has a state, even between owners while waiting for HSM.
3. Explictly step though getting the HSM signature on the funding tx
before starting channeld, rather than doing it in parallel: makes
states clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently create a peer struct, then complete handshake to find out
who it is. This means we have a half-formed peer, and worse: if it's
a reconnect we get two peers the same.
Add an explicit 'struct connection' for the handshake phase, and
construct a 'struct peer' once that's done.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker