Instead of making it ourselves, lightningd does it. Now we only have
two cases of failed htlcs: completely malformed (BADONION), and with
an already-wrapped onion reply to send.
This makes channeld's job much simpler.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For incoming htlcs, we need failure details in case we need to
re-xmit them. But for outgoing htlcs, lightningd is telling us it
already knows they've failed, so we just need to flag them failed
and don't need the details.
Internally, we set the ->fail to a dummy non-NULL value; this is
cleaned up next.
This matters for the next patch, which moves onion handling into
lightningd.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Break out a method for canceling a channel that will either
loop through contacting the peer to tell them of the error or
just directly cleans up if the peer is currently disconnected.
restrict fundchannel_cancel usage to only the opener side
Changelog-Changed: Only the opener of a fundchannel can cancel the channel open with fundchannel_cancel
We could use sendonion to do this, but it actually takes a different path through
pay, and I wanted to test all of it, so I made a new dev flag.
We currently get upset with the response:
lightningd/pay.c:556: payment_failed: Assertion `!hout->failcode' failed.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These messages may be exchanged between the master and any daemon. For now
these are just the daemons that a peer may be attached to at any time since
the first example of this is the custommsg infrastructure.
This is the final step: we pass the complete fee_states to and from
channeld.
Changelog-Fixed: "Bad commitment signature" closing channels when we sent back-to-back update_fee messages across multiple reconnects.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
A 'Bad commit_sig signature' was reported by @Javier on Telegram and
@DarthCoin. This was between two c-lightning peers, so definitely our fault.
Analysis of this message revealed the signature was using the wrong
feerate. I finally managed to make a test case which triggered this.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is mainly an internal-only change, especially since we don't
offer any globalfeatures.
However, LND (as of next release) will offer global features, and also
expect option_static_remotekey to be a *global* feature. So we send
our (merged) feature bitset as both global and local in init, and fold
those bitsets together when we get an init msg.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
`shutdown_scriptpubkey[REMOTE]` is original remote_shutdown_scriptpubkey;
`shutdown_scriptpubkey[LOCAL]` is the script used for "to-local" output when `close`. Add the default is generated form `final_key_idx`;
Store `shutdown_scriptpubkey[LOCAL]` into wallet;
We now have a pointer to chainparams, that fails valgrind if we do anything
chain-specific before setting it.
Suggested-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
The math is a bit tricky, so encapsulate it.
Includes the extra 'e' in 'announcable' as noted by @cdecker :)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's generally clearer to have simple hardcoded numbers with an
#if DEVELOPER around it, than apparent variables which aren't, really.
Interestingly, our pruning test was always kinda broken: we have to pass
two cycles, since l2 will refresh the channel once to avoid pruning.
Do the more obvious thing, and cut the network in half and check that
l1 and l3 time out.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently send channel_announcement as soon as we and our
peer agree it's 6 blocks deep. In theory, our other peers might
not have seen that block yet though, so delay a little.
This is mitigated by two factors:
1. lnd will stash any "not ready yet" channel_announcements anyway.
2. c-lightning doesn't enforce the 6 depth minimum at all.
We should not rely on other nodes' generosity or laxity, however!
Next release, we can start enforcing the depth limit, and maybe stashing
ones which don't quite make it (or simply enforce depth 5, not 6).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We normally reconnect after 1 second: have a flag to say wait for
60. This will be used in the next patch which handles "soft" errors.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Header from folded patch 'channel_fail_transient_slowretry.patch':
fixup! lightningd: add slow_reconnect flag for transient failure.
@ZmnSCPxj points out that function is unsafe, since omitting the bool
parameter still compiled. Make it two separate functions, each
with a distinctive name so every caller has to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There's only one caller which used the flag.
As a side-effect, now we'll try reconnect even if the previous owner
was NULL (which mainly effects the case where we couldn't create the subd).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fixes a corner case when reconnecting (which restarts channeld) at depth=6
where we didn't correctly send/respond with announce_signatures.
NOTE: A complete restart of node may initialize channeld with unupdated height
because of an unfinished rescan. But when rescan is finished, funding tx_watch is
fired (at least once), which then tells channeld the latest depth.
Encapsulating the peer state was a win for lightningd; not surprisingly,
it's even more of a win for the other daemons, especially as we want
to add a little gossip information.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. Add remote_ann_node_sigs and remote_bitcoin_sigs fields in channel_init message;
2. Master add announcement signatures into channel_init message, and send this message to Channeld.
Channeld will initial the channel with this signatures when it reenables the channel.
Channeld sends announcement signatures to Master by this message.
When Channeld receive a new channel announcement msg, (After channel locking)it will sends announcement signatures to Master by this message.
These are always handed to subdaemons as a set, so group them. This makes
it easier to add an fd (in the next patch).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For me this happened only under valgrind with
test_option_upfront_shutdown_script (in a pending branch):
==5063== by 0x51FC076: raise (raise.c:48)
==5063== by 0x51DD534: abort (abort.c:79)
==5063== by 0x1292D2: fatal (log.c:647)
==5063== by 0x116570: channel_set_state (channel.c:340)
==5063== by 0x116E04: lockin_complete (channel_control.c:73)
==5063== by 0x116F15: peer_got_funding_locked (channel_control.c:108)
==5063== by 0x117354: channel_msg (channel_control.c:208)
No CHANGELOG: this was introduced in a recent refactor.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. Rename channel_funding_locked to channel_funding_depth in
channeld/channel_wire.csv.
2. Add minimum_depth in struct channel in common/initial_channel.h and
change corresponding init function: new_initial_channel().
3. Add confirmation_needed in struct peer in channeld/channeld.c.
4. Rename channel_tell_funding_locked to channel_tell_depth.
5. Call channel_tell_depth even if depth < minimum, and still call
lockin_complete in channel_tell_depth, iff depth > minimum_depth.
6. channeld ignore the channel_funding_depth unless its >
minimum_depth(except to update billboard, and set
peer->confirmation_needed = minimum_depth - depth).
- Intrduce DB update `channel` values: `feerate_base` and `feerate_ppm`
- Make fist use of now context realted DB migration
- Add `struct channel` members of the same name
- Use struct values instead of config when commiting new channels
As a side-effect of using amount_msat in gossipd/routing.c, we explicitly
handle overflows and don't need to pre-prune ridiculous-fee channels.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian and I both unwittingly used it in form:
*tal_arr_expand(&x) = tal(x, ...)
Since '=' isn't a sequence point, the compiler can (and does!) cache
the value of x, handing it to tal *after* tal_arr_expand() moves it
due to tal_resize().
The new version is somewhat less convenient to use, but doesn't have
this problem, since the assignment is always evaluated after the
resize.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
darosior
lisa neigut
Christian Decker
Vasil Dimov
trueptolemy
Simon Vrouwe
trueptolemy
Michael Schmoock