This shaves off about 15% of our integration testing suite on my machine. It
assumes we never reorg below the first block the node starts with, which is true
for all tests, so it's safe.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Simplification of the offset calculation to use the rescan parameter, and rename
of `wallet_first_blocknum`. We now use either relative rescan from our last
known location, or absolute if a negative rescan was given. It's all handled in
a single location (except the case in which the blockcount is below our
precomputed offset), so this should reduce surprises.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This is intended to recover from an inconsistent state, involving
`onchaind`. Should we for some reason not restore the `onchaind` process
correctly we can instruct `lightningd` to go back in time and just replay
everything.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This is a big simplification, we just report the DBs current blockchain height
as the point to continue scanning, or the passed in default. No more guessing
where to continue from or whether the wallet was used and when it first saw the
light of day.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Since we reference the channel ID to allow cascades in the database we also need
the ability to look up a channel by its database ID.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This will allow us in the next commit to store the transactions that triggered
this event in the DB and thus allowing us to replay them later on.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This will be used to replay transactions that were witnessed in the blockchain
during startup, so that onchaind can be recreate its state.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
These transactions being seen on the blockchain triggered some action in
onchaind so we need to replay them when we restore the onchaind.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We used to queue the preimages to be sent to onchaind only after receiving the
onchaind_init_reply. Once we start replaying we might end up in a situation in
which we queue the tx that onchaind should react to before providing it with the
preimages. This commit just moves the preimages being sent, making it atomic
with the init, and without changing the order.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
These were so far only used for bolt11 construction, but we'll need them for the
DNS seed as well, so here we just pull them out into their own unit and prefix
them.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Retrying gives spurious failures, since we see transactions from previous
runs. That makes it near impossible to diagnose the actual problem.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Careful log examination revealed that we were generating a block before one
of the mutual close txs had entered the mempool. This is rare because it
means that both peers have to be too slow.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
d822ba1ee accidentally removed this case, which is important: if the
other side didn't get our final matching closing_signed, it will
reconnect and try again. We consider the channel no longer "active"
and thus ignore it, and get upset when it send the
`channel_reestablish` message.
We could just consider CLOSINGD_COMPLETE to be active, but then we'd
have to wait for the closing transaction to be mined before we'd allow
another connection.
We can't special case it when the peer reconnects, because there
could be (in theory) multiple channels for that peer in CLOSINGD_COMPLETE,
and we don't know which one to reestablish.
So, we need to catch this when they send the reestablish, and hand
that msg to closingd to do negotiation again. We already have code
to note that we're in CLOSINGD_COMPLETE and thus ignore any result
it gives us.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're about to remove automatic retrying of connect, and that uncovered
that we actually print out our "Server started" message before we create
the listening socket.
Move the init higher (outside the db transaction) and make it a
request/response, the loop until it's done.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The new connect code revealed an existing race: we tell gossipd to
release the peer, but at the same time it connects in. gossipd fails
the release because the peer is remote, and json_fundchannel fails.
Instead, we catch this race when we get peer_connected() and we were
trying to open a channel. It means keeping a list of fundchannels which
are awaiting a gossipd response though.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We missed it in some corner cases where we crashed/were killed between
being told of the lockin and sending the channel_normal_operation message.
When we were restarted, we were told both sides were locked in already,
so we never updated the state.
Pull the entire "tell channeld" logic into channel_control.c, and make
it clear that we need to keep waching if we cant't tell channeld. I think
we did get this correct in practice, since funding_announce_cb has the
same test, but it's better to be clear.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We'd usually commit to the db soon, but there's a window where it
could be missed.
Also moves loc into the block it's used and make it tmpctx to avoid
an explicit free.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Without this, we can get errors on shutdown:
Valgrind error file: valgrind-errors.27444
==27444== Invalid read of size 8
==27444== at 0x1950E2: secp256k1_pubkey_load (secp256k1.c:127)
==27444== by 0x19CF87: secp256k1_ec_pubkey_serialize (secp256k1.c:189)
==27444== by 0x14FED9: towire_pubkey (towire.c:59)
==27444== by 0x15AAFB: towire_gossipctl_peer_disconnected (gen_gossip_wire.c:969)
==27444== by 0x1253EF: opening_channel_errmsg (opening_control.c:526)
==27444== by 0x1386A3: destroy_subd (subd.c:589)
==27444== by 0x18222C: notify (tal.c:240)
==27444== by 0x1826E1: del_tree (tal.c:400)
==27444== by 0x182733: del_tree (tal.c:410)
==27444== by 0x182733: del_tree (tal.c:410)
==27444== by 0x182B1F: tal_free (tal.c:511)
==27444== by 0x11FC53: main (lightningd.c:410)
==27444== Address 0x6c3af98 is 72 bytes inside a block of size 216 free'd
==27444== at 0x4C30D3B: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==27444== by 0x1827BC: del_tree (tal.c:421)
==27444== by 0x182B1F: tal_free (tal.c:511)
==27444== by 0x11F3C7: shutdown_subdaemons (lightningd.c:211)
==27444== by 0x11FC27: main (lightningd.c:406)
==27444== Block was alloc'd at
==27444== at 0x4C2FB0F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==27444== by 0x182296: allocate (tal.c:250)
==27444== by 0x182863: tal_alloc_ (tal.c:448)
==27444== by 0x12F2DF: new_peer (peer_control.c:74)
==27444== by 0x125600: new_uncommitted_channel (opening_control.c:576)
==27444== by 0x125870: peer_accept_channel (opening_control.c:668)
==27444== by 0x13032A: peer_sent_nongossip (peer_control.c:427)
==27444== by 0x116B9E: peer_nongossip (gossip_control.c:60)
==27444== by 0x116F2B: gossip_msg (gossip_control.c:172)
==27444== by 0x138323: sd_msg_read (subd.c:503)
==27444== by 0x137C02: read_fds (subd.c:330)
==27444== by 0x175550: next_plan (io.c:59)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I had a weird failure which was caused by an unexpected disconnect and
reconnecct. Since we are prersistend and recover from these, they can
slip through our tests; most tests don't involve reconnection, so we
need to catch this explicitly.
For the connect() helper, we always suppress reconnection; tests which
want it all want other options so don't use this helper anyway. (Actually,
after I said that, test_closing_while_disconnected was added when I
rebased, which did require it, so I had to open-code that one).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Also report tx and txid, and whether we closed unilaterally or
bilaterally, if we could close the channel.
Also make a manpage.
Fixes: #1207Fixes: #714Fixes: #622
Mixing the test into the existing test allows us to reduce the execution, but
adds a bit of complexity, so I added two small helpers.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
For older clients we could do more exhaustive checks, but effort is better
spent on removing this altogether post 0.6 as clients upgrade.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian Decker
ZmnSCPxj
Rusty Russell
BT
conanoc
practicalswift