I actually hit this very hard to reproduce race: if we haven't process
the channeld message when block #6 comes in, we won't send the gossip
message. We wait for logs, but don't generate new blocks, and timeout
on l1.daemon.wait_for_log('peer_out WIRE_ANNOUNCEMENT_SIGNATURES').
The solution, which also tests that we don't send announcement signatures
immediately, is to generate a single block, wait for CHANNELD_NORMAL,
then (in gossip tests), generate 5 more.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The format we use to generate marshal/unmarshal code is from
the spec's tools/extract-formats.py which includes the offset:
we don't use it at all, so rather than having manually-calculated
(and thus probably wrong) values, or 0, emit it altogther.
Reported-by: Christian Decker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We can go to release a gossip peer, and it can fail at the same time.
We work around the problem that the reply must be a gossipctl_release_peer_reply
with two fds, but it's not pretty.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We kill the existing connection if possible; this may mean simply
forgetting the prior peer altogether if it's in an early state.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We steal it when we're closing connection, but we normally want to forget
it if connection just dies.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to do this on every connection, whether reconnecting or not,
so it makes sense for the handshake daemon to handle it and return
the feature fields.
Longer term I'm considering having the handshake daemon handle the
listening and connecting, and simply hand the fds back once the peers
are ready.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The single string-based hostname and port has been retired in favor of
having multiple `struct ipaddr`s from the `node_announcement`. This
breaks the hostnames and ports from IRC, but I didn't bother to
backport ipaddr for it since it is only used in the legacy daemon.
Rather a big commit, but I couldn't figure out how to split it
nicely. It introduces a new message from the channel to the master
signaling that the channel has been announced, so that the master can
take care of announcing the node itself. A provisorial announcement is
created and passed to the HSM, which signs it and passes it back to
the master. Finally the master injects it into gossipd which will take
care of broadcasting it.
We were getting an assert "!secp256k1_fe_is_zero(&ge->x)", because
an all-zero pubkey is invalid. We allow marshal/unmarshal of NULL for
now, and clean up the error handling.
1. Use status_failed if master sends a bad message.
2. Similarly, kill the gossip daemon if it gives a bad reply.
3. Use an array for returned pubkeys: 0 or 2.
4. Use type_to_string(trc, struct short_channel_id, &scid) for tracing.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we now use the short_channel_id to identify the next hop we need
to resolve the channel_id to the pubkey of the next hop. This is done
by calling out to `gossipd` and stuffing the necessary information
into `htlc_end` and recovering it from there once we receive a reply.
Adds a new command line flag `--dev-broadcast-interval=<ms>` that
allows us to specify how often the staggered broadcast should
trigger. The value is passed down to `gossipd` via an init message.
This is mainly useful for integration tests, since we do not want to
wait forever for gossip to propagate.
We were using an uninitialized `broadcast_index` on the peer which
would occasionally result in no forwardings at all, segmenting the
network. And during the `msg_queue` refactor, some wait targets were
not updated, resulting in the waits never to be woken up.
Rather than dumping all gossip messages then handling local ones again.
This should help us give timely ping replies.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Copied the JSON-request parsing from `pay.c`, passing through to
`gossipd`, filling the reply with the `route_hop` serialization, and
serializing as JSON-RPC response.
This came up while debugging the gossip daemon breaking upon calling
`getroute`. It turns out that log was still writing to stdout, but
stdout had been reused for an inter-daemon socket, which would
break...
We remove the unused status_send_fd, and rename status_send_sync (it
should only be used for that case now).
We add a status_setup_async(), and wire things internally to use that
if it's set up: status_setup() is renamed status_setup_sync().
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The gossip subdaemon previously passed the fd after init: this is
unnecessary for peers which simply want to gossip (and not establish
channels).
Now we hand the gossip fd back with the peer fd. This adds another
error message for when we fail to create the gossip fds.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This measn that gossip (which also wants to wake it) needs to wake
the queue, not the daemon_conn.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use the fourth value (size) to determine the type, unless the fifth
value is suppled. That's silly: allow the fourth value to be a typename,
since that's the only reason we care about the size at all!
Unfortunately there are places in the spec where we use a raw fieldname
without '*1' for a length, so we have to distingish this from the
typename case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were firing off the wakeup timers all over the place, out of fear
that we would be triggering two concurrent broadcasts. This is not
really the case since the wakeup calls are idempotent. This also
allows us not to differentiate between triggering a broadcast on a
local peer or on a proxied peer.
This includes some code duplication, but since the two write targets
are fundamentally different we might need to refactor a bit more to
unify them again.
We will eventually ween off of the logging, or replace it with status
messages that log in `lightningd`, but for now we still have the
routing module that does some logging.
This is a bit tricky: for our signing code, we don't want scriptsigs,
but to calculate the txid, we need them. For most transactions in lightning,
they're pure segwit so it doesn't matter, but funding transactions can
have P2SH-wrapped P2WPKH inputs.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker