This was flaky because we didn't wait for the fee update to complete
and were using the old, way too small, fees, which upset bitcoind.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
delinvoice was orginally documented to only allow deletion of unpaid
invoices, but there might be reasons to delete paid ones or unexpired ones.
But we have to avoid the race where someone pays as it's deleted: the
easiest way is to have the caller tell us the status, and fail if
it's wrong.
Fixes: #477
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're going to have to support multiple channels per peer, even if only
when some are onchain. This would break the current listpeers, so
change it to an array (single element for now).
Other cleanups:
1. Only set connected true if daemon is not onchaind.
2. Only show netaddr if connected; don't make it an array, call it `address`
in comparison with `addresses` in listnodes.
3. Rename `channel` to `short_channel_id`
4. Add `funding_txid` field for voyeurism.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Individual tests can always re-enable them, though.
[ More test fallout fixes by Christian Decker ]
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Seems to avoid the nasty python resource warnings, as well as the
fatal 'ValueError: PyMemoryView_FromBuffer(): info->buf must not be NULL'
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This, of course, should never be used. But it helps maintain connections
for the moment while we dig deeper into feerates.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For now this just tests that we are sending out keepalive
channel_updates for all local channels.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Since most callers use positional arguments, we should allow a 'null'
literal where we require no value at all.
Also adds some more value tests.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Paid invoices need to know how much was actually paid: both for the case
where no 'msatoshi' amount was specified, and for the normal case, where
clients are permitted to overpay in order to help them disguise their
payments.
While we migrate the db, we leave this field as 0 for old paid
invoices. This is unhelpful for accounting, but at least clearly
indicates what happened if we find this in the wild.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
'rhash' is the old terminology, but 'payment_preimage' and
'payment_hash' were decided on for the BOLTs, so we should fix that here.
We still use rhash internally, but that's much easier to fix.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> assert [c['active'] for c in l2.rpc.getchannels()['channels']] == [True, True]
E AssertionError: assert [False, True] == [True, True]
E At index 0 diff: False != True
E Full diff:
E - [False, True]
E + [True, True]
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to make sure all the updates are known to gossip. Since
one is the local update, we change that message to look the same.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Receiving them in channeld is not enough to avoid the race:
route = l1.rpc.getroute(l3.info['id'], 4999999, 1)["route"]
...
ValueError: RPC call failed: Could not find a route
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We wait the the receipt of the CHANNEL_UPDATE message by channeld,
but that doesn't mean it reached gossipd yet, causing spurious test
failure.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
practicalswift
ZmnSCPxj
Igor Cota