This matters in one case: channeld receiving a bad message is a
permenant failure, whereas losing a connection is transient.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need the old remote per_commitment_point so we can validate the
per_commitment_secret when we get it.
We unify this housekeeping in the master daemon using
update_per_commit_point().
This patch also saves whether remote funding is locked, and disallows
doing that twice (channeld should ignore it).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There are two ways we can do retransmission on reconnect: re-derive
what we would have sent, or remember it and simply re-send. The
rederivation is difficult: unwinding state depends on whether we sent
a revoke_and_ack before or after the commitment_signed, and unwinding
a revoke_and_ack would require us to remember HTLCs we would have
normally forgotten at this point.
So we simply tell the master to remember the old signatures for us,
and hand them back in case we need to re-send.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In the case where we can't decrypt the onion, we can't fail it in the
normal way (which is encrypted using the onion shared secret), we need
to respond with a update_fail_malformed_htlc message.
Moreover, we need to remember this for persistence. This means that
we really have three conclusions for an HTLC: fulfilled, failed,
malformed. Fix up the logic everywhere which assumed failed or
fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's easiest to have the master keep the last commit we sent, for
re-transmission. We could recalculate it, but it's made more difficult
by the before/after revoke case.
And because revoke_and_ack changes the channel state, we need to
remember which order we sent them in for re-transmission.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It needs to save them to the db in case of restart; this means we tell
it about funding_locked, as well as the next_per_commit_point given
in revoke_and_ack.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The channel daemon gets the shared secrets from the HSM to save
the master daemon some work. It used to hand these over at
revoke_and_ack receive, which is when the master daemon needs them.
However, it's a bit simpler to hand them over when we first tell
the master about the incoming HTLC (the first commitsig).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When adding their HTLCs, it needs all the information. When failing,
it needs the id as key and the failure reason. When fulfilling, it
needs the id and payment preimage.
It also needs to know when we have received an revoke_and_ack or a
commitment_signed, to place in the database.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We still get the shared secret, since that requires a round trip to the HSM
(why waste the master daemon's time?) but it does the processing, which
simplifies the message passing and things like realm handling which
have nothing to do with this particular channeld.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The format we use to generate marshal/unmarshal code is from
the spec's tools/extract-formats.py which includes the offset:
we don't use it at all, so rather than having manually-calculated
(and thus probably wrong) values, or 0, emit it altogther.
Reported-by: Christian Decker
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use this to make it send the funding_signed message, rather than having
the master daemon do it (which was even more hacky). It also means it
can handle the crypto, so no need for the packet to be handed up encrypted,
and also make --dev-disconnect "just work" for this packet.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. We explicitly assert what state we're coming from, to make transitions
clearer.
2. Every transition has a state, even between owners while waiting for HSM.
3. Explictly step though getting the HSM signature on the funding tx
before starting channeld, rather than doing it in parallel: makes
states clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rather a big commit, but I couldn't figure out how to split it
nicely. It introduces a new message from the channel to the master
signaling that the channel has been announced, so that the master can
take care of announcing the node itself. A provisorial announcement is
created and passed to the HSM, which signs it and passes it back to
the master. Finally the master injects it into gossipd which will take
care of broadcasting it.
We alternated between using a sha256 and using a privkey, but there are
numerous places where we have a random 32 bytes which are neither.
This fixes many of them (plus, struct privkey is now defined in terms of
struct secret).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we now use the short_channel_id to identify the next hop we need
to resolve the channel_id to the pubkey of the next hop. This is done
by calling out to `gossipd` and stuffing the necessary information
into `htlc_end` and recovering it from there once we receive a reply.
Mainly switching from the old include to the new include and adjusting
the actual size of the onion packet. It also moves `channel.c` to use
`struct hop_data`.
It introduces a dummy next hop in `channel.c` that will be replaced in
the next commit.
We use the fourth value (size) to determine the type, unless the fifth
value is suppled. That's silly: allow the fourth value to be a typename,
since that's the only reason we care about the size at all!
Unfortunately there are places in the spec where we use a raw fieldname
without '*1' for a length, so we have to distingish this from the
typename case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker