This change is really to allow us to have a --dev-fail-on-subdaemon-fail option
so we can handle failures from subdaemons generically.
It also neatens handling so we can have an explicit callback for "peer
did something wrong" (which matters if we want to close the channel in
that case).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We had a terrible hack in gossip when a peer didn't exist. Formalize
a pattern when code+200 is a failure (with no fds passed), and use it
here.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use a file descriptor, so when we consume an entry, we move past it
(and everyone shares a file offset, so this works).
The file contains packet names prefixed by - (treat fd as closed when
we try to write this packet), + (write the packet then ensure the file
descriptor fails), or @ ("lose" the packet then ensure the file
descriptor fails).
The sync and async peer-write functions hook this in automatically.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Header from folded patch 'test-run-cryptomsg__fix_compilation.patch':
test/run-cryptomsg: fix compilation.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If a peer dies, and then we get a reply, that can cause access after free.
The usual way to handle this is to make the request a child of the peer,
but in fact we still want to catch (and disard) it, so it's a little
more complex internally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of indicating where to place the fd, you say how many: the
fd array gets passed into the callback.
This is also clearer for the users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This uses a single fd for both status and control.
To make this work, we enforce the convention that replies are the same
as requests + 100, and that their name ends in "_REPLY".
This also means that various daemons can simply exit when done; there's
no race between reading request and closing status fds.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell