Paid invoices need to know how much was actually paid: both for the case
where no 'msatoshi' amount was specified, and for the normal case, where
clients are permitted to overpay in order to help them disguise their
payments.
While we migrate the db, we leave this field as 0 for old paid
invoices. This is unhelpful for accounting, but at least clearly
indicates what happened if we find this in the wild.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This reuses the same code internally, and also now means that we deal
correctly with "any" msatoshi invoices: the old code would a return
'msatoshi' of 0 in that case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were using int32 for msatoshi values for outputs, which would
overflow for values larger than 2^32.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This is necessary to grad the their_unilateral/to-us outputs since
they aren't being harvested by `onchaind`
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This gives us a lower bound on where funding tx could be.
In theory, it could be lower than this if we get a reorganization, but
in practice this is already a 1-block buffer (since we can't get into
current block, only the next one).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's only used for tests, but it's better to use the wallet_channels_load_active like
the real code.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's just a sha256_double, but importantly when we convert it to a
string (in type_to_string, which is used in logging) we use
bitcoin_txid_to_hex() so it's reversed as people expect.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It looks like we were missing the address on insert into the peers table. This
will insert the address formatted by fmt_wireaddr. This happens to include the
ip and port.
This is fine, since parse_wireaddr has been updated to parse ports in ip address
strings.
Signed-off-by: William Casarin <jb55@jb55.com>
Accuracy improvements:
1. We assumed the output was a p2wpkh, but it can be user-supplied now.
2. We assumed we always had change; remove this for wallet_select_all.
Calculation out-by-one fixes:
1. We need to add 1 byte (4 sipa) for the input count.
2. We need to add 1 byte (4 sipa) for the output count.
3. We need to add 1 byte (4 sipa) for the output script length for each output.
4. We need to add 1 byte (4 sipa) for the input script length for each input.
5. We need to add 1 byte (4 sipa) for the PUSH optcode for each P2SH input.
The results are now a slight overestimate (due to guessing 73 bytes
for signature, whereas they're 71 or 72 in practice).
Fixes: #458
Reported-by: Jonas Nick @jonasnick
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We weren't incrementing the `col` for the `local_shutdown_idx` field,
which meant that all following fields were incorrect. I removed the
`col` computation and opted for absolute indices instead, since they
are way less brittle. Just remember to add new fields to the query at
the end so we don't have to shift too often :-)
Reported-by: William Casarin @jb55
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
The wire protocol uses this, in the assumption that we'll never see feerates
in excess of 4294967 satoshi per kiloweight.
So let's use that consistently internally as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Used by the JSON-RPC for the listtransfers call. Currently does not
support any form of paging.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We save location where transaction was started, in case we try to nest.
There's now no error case; db_exec_mayfail() is the only one.
This means the tests need to override fatal() if they want to intercept
these errors.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We're going to be always in a transaction soon.
Note the rollback we used to do was an optimization: the utxo destructors
would already clean up the new UTXOs in the database.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the only case where we actually rely on the db to ensure we don't
do something twice: don't error out if it fails.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Nesting is provided by only actually performing the outermost
transaction and simulating the nested ones. This still allows us to
ensure on lower levels that we are in the context of a transaction
without having to resort to keeping explicitly track of it in the
calling code.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
In addition we also set some of the test values to a pattern instead
of just `memset`ting it to 0, which may hide some crossed lines.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
ZmnSCPxj
Christian Decker
Rusty Russell
William Casarin