These tests have proven to be:
a) very expensive, as they spin up many nodes, and perform long setup
b) are not testing anything specific, they just fuzz functionality
that is already tested otherwise
c) have not helped pinpoint any issues in living memory
d) are very flaky, making for really bad signal-to-noise, so much
that devs usually just restart without even looking at the logs
e) even if we were to look at the logs, we'd be unable to reproduce
due to the inherent randomness involved in these tests
f) are really noisy neighbors, causing other tests to flake as well,
further muddying the water
All in all, these tests are a waste of time, and source of
frustration.
[ Cleaned up python unused imports --RR ]
Changelog-None
This restores the behaviour prior to `lightningd: use our cached
channel_update for errors instead of asking gossipd.`, where gossipd
would refuse to give us channel_updates for unannounced channels.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
But this requires a watch-only wallet, and python-bitcoinlib doesn't support
multiple wallets, so we need to unload the original one, but then we need
to generate a block, so that can't generate a new address, so we need
an address arg to generate_block.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We really need our own lnprototest tests for packet-based stuff;
these message-based tests are inherently delicate and awkward.
In particular, connectd now does dev-disconnect, so the socket is not
immediately closed after a dev-disconnect command. In this case, the
WIRE_SHUTDOWN has often already been written from connectd to channeld.
But it sometimes works, too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If the HTLCs are completely negotiated, we can get a channel break when
we mine a pile of blocks. This is mainly seen with Postgres, due to the db
speed.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we call update_channel_from_inflight *twice* with the same inflight, we
will get bad results. Using tal_steal() here was a premature optimization:
```
Valgrind error file: valgrind-errors.496395
==496395== Invalid read of size 8
==496395== at 0x22A9D3: to_tal_hdr (tal.c:174)
==496395== by 0x22B4B5: tal_steal_ (tal.c:498)
==496395== by 0x16A13D: update_channel_from_inflight (peer_control.c:1225)
==496395== by 0x16A4C7: funding_depth_cb (peer_control.c:1299)
==496395== by 0x182807: txw_fire (watch.c:232)
==496395== by 0x182AA9: watch_topology_changed (watch.c:300)
==496395== by 0x1290ED: updates_complete (chaintopology.c:624)
==496395== by 0x129BF4: get_new_block (chaintopology.c:835)
==496395== by 0x125EEF: getrawblockbyheight_callback (bitcoind.c:362)
==496395== by 0x176ECC: plugin_response_handle (plugin.c:584)
==496395== by 0x1770F5: plugin_read_json_one (plugin.c:690)
==496395== by 0x1772D9: plugin_read_json (plugin.c:735)
==496395== Address 0x89fbb08 is 24 bytes inside a block of size 104 free'd
==496395== at 0x483CA3F: free (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==496395== by 0x22B193: del_tree (tal.c:421)
==496395== by 0x22B461: tal_free (tal.c:486)
==496395== by 0x16A123: update_channel_from_inflight (peer_control.c:1223)
==496395== by 0x16A4C7: funding_depth_cb (peer_control.c:1299)
==496395== by 0x182807: txw_fire (watch.c:232)
==496395== by 0x182AA9: watch_topology_changed (watch.c:300)
==496395== by 0x1290ED: updates_complete (chaintopology.c:624)
==496395== by 0x129BF4: get_new_block (chaintopology.c:835)
==496395== by 0x125EEF: getrawblockbyheight_callback (bitcoind.c:362)
==496395== by 0x176ECC: plugin_response_handle (plugin.c:584)
==496395== by 0x1770F5: plugin_read_json_one (plugin.c:690)
==496395== Block was alloc'd at
==496395== at 0x483B7F3: malloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==496395== by 0x22AC1C: allocate (tal.c:250)
==496395== by 0x22B1DD: tal_alloc_ (tal.c:428)
==496395== by 0x22B3A6: tal_alloc_arr_ (tal.c:471)
==496395== by 0x22C094: tal_dup_ (tal.c:805)
==496395== by 0x12B274: new_inflight (channel.c:187)
==496395== by 0x136D4C: wallet_commit_channel (dual_open_control.c:1260)
==496395== by 0x13B084: handle_commit_received (dual_open_control.c:2839)
==496395== by 0x13B6AF: dual_opend_msg (dual_open_control.c:2976)
==496395== by 0x1809FF: sd_msg_read (subd.c:553)
==496395== by 0x218F5D: next_plan (io.c:59)
==496395== by 0x219B65: do_plan (io.c:407)
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we fund a channel between two nodes, then mine all the blocks to
announce it, any other nodes may see the announcement before the
blocks, causing CI to complain about "bad gossip":
```
lightningd-4: 2022-01-25T22:33:25.468Z DEBUG 032cf15d1ad9c4a08d26eab1918f732d8ef8fdc6abb9640bf3db174372c491304e-gossipd: Ignoring future channel_announcment for 113x1x1 (current block 112)
lightningd-4: 2022-01-25T22:33:25.468Z DEBUG 032cf15d1ad9c4a08d26eab1918f732d8ef8fdc6abb9640bf3db174372c491304e-gossipd: Bad gossip order: WIRE_CHANNEL_UPDATE before announcement 113x1x1/0
lightningd-4: 2022-01-25T22:33:25.468Z DEBUG 032cf15d1ad9c4a08d26eab1918f732d8ef8fdc6abb9640bf3db174372c491304e-gossipd: Bad gossip order: WIRE_CHANNEL_UPDATE before announcement 113x1x1/1
lightningd-4: 2022-01-25T22:33:25.468Z DEBUG 032cf15d1ad9c4a08d26eab1918f732d8ef8fdc6abb9640bf3db174372c491304e-gossipd: Bad gossip order: WIRE_NODE_ANNOUNCEMENT before announcement 032cf15d1ad9c4a08d26eab1918f732d8ef8fdc6abb9640bf3db174372c491304e
```
Add a new helper for this case, and use it where there are more than 2 nodes.
Cleans up test_routing_gossip and a few other places which did this manually.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were relying on the fee update to create an additional tx. That's
ugly; do an actual payment and make sure we definitely complete a new
tx by waiting for that *then* both revoke_and_ack.
(Without this, we could get a unilateral close instead of a penalty).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is neater than what we had before, and slightly more general.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: JSON_RPC: `sendcustommsg` now works with any connected peer, even when shutting down a channel.
Next patch starts a timeout ping, which can interfere with results.
In theory, we should reply, but in practice (so far!) we seem to get enough
time that it doesn't hang up on us.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We also no longer strip the type off: everyone handles both forms, and
Eclair doesn't strip (and it's easier!).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Even if we're deferring putting them in the store and broadcasting them,
we tell lightningd so it will use it in any error messages.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This fixes lightningd's chronic weight underestimate.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: closingd: more accurate weight estimation helps mutual closing near min/max feerates.
The blockheight is zero though, since these aren't included in a block
yet.
We also don't issue an 'external' deposit event if we can tell that the
address you're sending to actually belongs to our wallet (we'll issue a
deposit event when it gets included in a block)
```
l1.rpc.disconnect(l2.info['id'], force=True)
l1.rpc.connect(l2.info['id'], 'localhost', l2.port)
> l1.daemon.wait_for_log('option_static_remotekey enabled at 2/2')
tests/test_connection.py:3653:
```
If l2's channeld gets killed (due to reconnect) before it tells
lightningd it got the revoke_and_ack it will need a retransmission
*again*.
This makes the test more robust, and does more checks too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
OK, now this test makes more sense! Now we don't ignore errors, we
*will* drop to chain if we reconnect after one side has dropped to
chain.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
There's actually a bug in our closing tx size estimation; I'll do
a separate patch for this, though.
Seems this used to be flaky, now we always flush queues, so it's
more reliably caught.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We seem to hit a race between manual reconnect (with address hint) and an automatic
reconnection attempt which fails:
```
> l4.rpc.connect(l3.info['id'], 'localhost', l3.port)
...
E pyln.client.lightning.RpcError: RPC call failed: method: connect, payload: {'id': '035d2b1192dfba134e10e540875d366ebc8bc353d5aa766b80c090b39c3a5d885d', 'host': 'localhost', 'port': 41285}, error: {'code': 401, 'message': 'All addresses failed: 127.0.0.1:36678: Connection establishment: Connection refused. '}
```
See how it didn't even try the given address?
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
l1 might split in a commitment_signed before it notices the disconnect, and this test fails:
```
for i in range(0, len(disconnects)):
with pytest.raises(RpcError):
l1.rpc.sendpay(route, rhash, payment_secret=inv['payment_secret'])
> l1.rpc.waitsendpay(rhash)
E Failed: DID NOT RAISE <class 'pyln.client.lightning.RpcError'>
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We now let gossipd do it.
This also means there's nothing left in 'struct per_peer_state' to
send across the wire (the fds are sent separately), so that gets
removed from wire messages too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We actually intercept the gossip_timestamp_filter, so the gossip_store
mechanism inside the per-peer daemon never kicks off for normal connections.
The gossipwith tool doesn't set OPT_GOSSIP_QUERIES, so it gets both, but
that only effects one place.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
channeld can't do it any more: it's using local sockets. Connectd
can do it, and simply does it by type.
Amazingly, on my machine the timing change *always* caused
test_channel_receivable() to fail, due to a latent race.
Includes feedback from @cdecker.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As connectd handles more packets itself, or diverts them to/from gossipd,
it's the only place we can implement the dev_disconnect logic.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This test started mostly failing (in non-DEVELOPER mode) after the
next patch, due to timing issues.
Handle both cases for now, and we'll add more enhancements later to
things we should be handling more consistently.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I also got an error under CI; it seems the sleep() was insufficient.
So try adding a sleep inside the check_coin_moves, which should cover
everyone.
```
acct_moves = acct_moves[number_moves:]
else:
> if not move_matches(m, acct_moves[0]):
E IndexError: list index out of range
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Once connectd is doing this, we can't close as soon as we send,
and in fact we can't do 'fail write' either.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These would have to be done by connectd, not the local daemon, once it's
intermediating. Otherwise the remote peer won't see any change.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fire off a snapshot of current account balances (node wallet + every
'active' channel) after we've caught up to the chain tip for the *first*
time (in other words, on start).
We need to stash/save the amount of the lease fees on a leased channel,
we do this by re-using the 'push' amount field on channel (which is
technically correct, since we're essentially pushing the fee amount to
the peer).
Also updates a bit of how the pushes are accounted for (pushed to now
has an event; their channel will open at zero but then they'll
immediately register a push event).
Leases fees are treated exactly the same as pushes, except labeled
differently.
Required adding a 'lease_fee' field to the inflights so we keep track of
the fee for the lease until the open happens.
If we initialized the payment, the fees are the entire fee-chain
(final hop amount - starting hop amount)
If it's a payment we routed, the fees are the diff between the
inbound htlc and the outbound (net gain by this routing)
Added to database so data persists nicely.
We record the amount of fees collected for a routed payment. For
simplicity's sake on the data agg side, we record the fee payment on
*BOTH* the incoming htlc and the outgoing htlc. Note that this results
in double counting if you add up the fees from both an in-routed and
out-routed payment.
Get rid of the 'movement_idx', since we replay events now.
Since we're removing a field from the 'coin_movement' event emission, we
bump the version type.
Changelog-Updated: `coin_movements` events have been revamped and are now on version 2.
test_onchain_dust_out restarts a node, which produces duplicate events.
this is expected, but we need to de-duplicate the events stream to get
accurate results
The old model of coin movements attempted to compute fees etc and log
amounts, not utxos. This is not as robust, as multi-party opens and dual
funded channels make it hard to account for fees etc correctly.
Instead, we move towards a 'utxo' view of the onchain events. Every
event is either the creation or 'destruction' of a utxo. For cases where
the value of the utxo is not (fully) debited/credited to our account, we
also record the output_value. E.g. channel closings spend a utxo who's
entire value we may not own.
Since we're now tracking UTXOs onchain, we can now do more complex
assertions about the onchain footprint of them. The integration tests
have been updated to now use more 'chain aware' assertions about the
ending state.
Suggested-by: Rusty Russell
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Changelog-Changed: Support hsm specific error error code in lightning-cli
Simon Vrouwe
Christian Decker
Rusty Russell
Michael Schmoock
niftynei
Vincenzo Palazzo