We need to still accept it when parsing the database, but this flag
should allow upgrade testing for devs building on top
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Christian and I both unwittingly used it in form:
*tal_arr_expand(&x) = tal(x, ...)
Since '=' isn't a sequence point, the compiler can (and does!) cache
the value of x, handing it to tal *after* tal_arr_expand() moves it
due to tal_resize().
The new version is somewhat less convenient to use, but doesn't have
this problem, since the assignment is always evaluated after the
resize.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Obviously the Facebook relationship status joke was a bit subtle, but I've
continued it anyway because I'm especially susceptible to Dad jokes.
Suggested-by: @niftynei
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Usually, this means they return 'command_param_failed()' if param()
fails, and changing 'command_success(); return;' to 'return
command_success()'.
Occasionally, it's more complex: there's a command_its_complicated()
for the case where we can't exactly determine what the status is,
but it should be considered a last resort.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Handers of a specific form are both designed to be used as callbacks
for param(), and also dispose of the command if something goes wrong.
Make them return the 'struct command_result *' from command_failed(),
or NULL.
Renaming them just makes sense: json_tok_XXX is used for non-command-freeing
parsers too.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These routines free the 'struct command': a common coding error is not
to return immediately.
To catch this, we make them return a non-NULL 'struct command_result
*', and we're going to make the command handlers return the same (to
encourage 'return command_fail(...)'-style usage).
We also provide two sources for external use:
1. command_param_failed() when param() fails.
2. command_its_complicated() for some complex cases.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
json_escaped.[ch], param.[ch] and jsonrpc_errors.h move from lightningd/
to common/. Tests moved too.
We add a new 'common/json_tok.[ch]' for the common parameter parsing
routines which a plugin might want, taking them out of
lightningd/json.c (which now only contains the lightningd-specific
ones).
The rest is mainly fixing up includes.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is prep work for when we sign htlc txs with
SIGHASH_SINGLE|SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY.
We still deal with raw signatures for the htlc txs at the moment, since
we send them like that across the wire, and changing that was simply too
painful (for the moment?).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For onchaind we need to remove globals from memleak consideration;
we also change the htlc pointer to an htlc copy, which simplifies
things as well.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We promote 'struct json_stream' to contain the membuf; we only attach
the json_stream to the command when we actually call
json_stream_success / json_stream_fail.
This means we are closer to 'struct json_stream' being an independent
layer; the tests are already modified to use it directly to create
JSON.
This is also the first step toward re-enabling non-serial command
execution.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Such an API is required for when we stream it directly. Almost all our
handlers fit this pattern already, or nearly do.
We remove new_json_result() in favor of explicit json_stream_success()
and json_stream_fail(), but still allowing command_fail() if you just
want a simple all-in-one fail wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It's the only user of them, and it's going to get optimized.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
gossip.pydiff --git a/common/test/run-json.c b/common/test/run-json.c
index 956fdda35..db52d6b01 100644
If another channel has set the optional `htlc_maximum_msat` field,
we should correctly parse that field and respect it when drawing up
routes for payments.
We split json_invoice(), as it now needs to round-trip to the gossipd,
and uniqueness checks need to happen *after* gossipd replies to avoid
a race.
For every candidate channel gossipd gives us, we check that it's in
state NORMAL (not shutting down, not still waiting for lockin), that
it's connected, and that it has capacity. We then choose one with
probability weighted by excess capacity, so larger channels are more
likely.
As a side effect of this, we can tell if an invoice is unpayble (no
channels have sufficient incoming capacity) or difficuly (no *online*
channels have sufficient capacity), so we add those warnings.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
Conor Scott
lisa neigut