We had a terrible hack in gossip when a peer didn't exist. Formalize
a pattern when code+200 is a failure (with no fds passed), and use it
here.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We use a file descriptor, so when we consume an entry, we move past it
(and everyone shares a file offset, so this works).
The file contains packet names prefixed by - (treat fd as closed when
we try to write this packet), + (write the packet then ensure the file
descriptor fails), or @ ("lose" the packet then ensure the file
descriptor fails).
The sync and async peer-write functions hook this in automatically.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Header from folded patch 'test-run-cryptomsg__fix_compilation.patch':
test/run-cryptomsg: fix compilation.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If a peer dies, and then we get a reply, that can cause access after free.
The usual way to handle this is to make the request a child of the peer,
but in fact we still want to catch (and disard) it, so it's a little
more complex internally.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of indicating where to place the fd, you say how many: the
fd array gets passed into the callback.
This is also clearer for the users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This uses a single fd for both status and control.
To make this work, we enforce the convention that replies are the same
as requests + 100, and that their name ends in "_REPLY".
This also means that various daemons can simply exit when done; there's
no race between reading request and closing status fds.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell