And no longer insist on opt_quiesce.
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: Config: `--experimental-upgrade-protocol` enables simple channel upgrades.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: Protocol: we will upfront reject channel_open which asks for a zeroconf channel unless we are going to do a zerconf channel.
I tested this indeed breaks if we don't accept it, then implemented
the code to accept it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: protocol: We now correctly accept the `option_scid_alias` bit in `open_channel` `channel_type`.
Changelog-Deprecated: protocol: Not setting `option_scid_alias` in `option_channel` `channel_type` for unannounced channels.
Libwally update breaks compatibility, so
we do this in one large step.
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: elements network PSET now only supports PSETv2.
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: PSBTv2 supported for fundchannel_complete, openchannel_update, reserveinputs, sendpsbt, signpsbt, withdraw and unreserveinputs parameter psbt, openchannel_init and openchannel_bump parameter initialpsbt, openchannel_signed parameter signed_psbt and utxopsbt parameter utxopsbt
- Renamed zerod_channel_ids to temporary_channel_id
- Renamed witness_stack->witnesses
- Renamed witness_element->witness_elements
- open_channel2 now includes second commitment point
- accept_channel2 now includes second commitment point
Current commit on rfc branch 64f7f360b9f3c2664d078e2129cfe83098fc4617
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: Protocol: dual-funding spec changed in incompatible ways, won't work with old versions (but maybe soon with Eclair!!)
It's not likely but possible that the node's settings will shift btw a
start and an RBF; we persist the setting to the database so we don't
lose it.
Right now holding onto it forever is kind of extra but maybe we'll
reuse the setting for splices? idk.
Should this be a channel type??
`openchannel_init` takes a psbt, which we pipe over to dualopend
process.
If the peer requests that they'll only accept confirmed inputs, we need
to go validate those before we continue.
This wires up the harness for this (validation check yet tc)
Wait until we get a tx-abort back to terminate the process.
Nota Bene: this can cause RPC calls to hang if the peer never
responds back with tx-abort.
Note that we also have to re-route how open-abort + negotiation_failed
handle failures, as open_abort no longer closes the process
automagically.
When a channel open fails, we use tx-abort instead of warning/error.
This means that the peer won't disconnect! And instead when a new
message arrives, we'll need to rebuild the dualopend subd (if missing).
Makes opens a bit easer to retry (no reconnect needed), as well as keeps
the connection alive for other channels we may have with that peer.
Changelog-Changed: Experimental-Dual-Fund: open failures don't disconnect, but instead fail the opening process
Prior to this we might end up with a commitment transaction without
any outputs, if combined with `--dev-allowdustreserve`. Otherwise the
reserve being larger than dust means the funder could not drop its
direct output to be below dust.
Reported-by: Rusty Russell <@rustyrussell>
Technically this is a non-conformance with the spec, hence the `dev`
flag to opt-in, however I'm being told that it is also implemented in
other implementations. I'll follow this up with a proposal to the spec
to remove the checks we now bypass.
This check, while in line with the specification, would cause issues
in mixed setups when the funder or fundee allows dust reserves, but
the counterparty does not. It is not an issue for the non-dust reserve
node since in this case it's the peer giving us more flexibility not
the other way around.
Technically this is a non-conformance with the spec, hence the `dev`
flag to opt-in, however I'm being told that it is also implemented in
other implementations. I'll follow this up with a proposal to the spec
to remove the checks we now bypass.
This is incompatible with the spec as it removes the enforcement for
reserves being above dust, but from what I can see from other
implementations it seems that others have allowed this as well.
This commit just guards the necessary changes with compilation guards, so
we can decide either way quickly. This part of the PR is not intended
to be final, just as a discussion basis.
Add memleak_ignore_children() so callers can do exclusions themselves.
Having two exclusions was always such a hack!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1) dualopen has fd to connectd
2) channeld needs to take over
3) dualopen passes fd that leads to a connectd over for channeld to use
4) lightningd must receive the fd transfer request and process
5) dualopen shuts down and closes everything it owns
4 & 5 end up in a race. If 5 happens before 4, channeld ends up with an invalid fd for connectd — leaving it in a position to not receive messages.
Lingering for a second makes 4 win the race. Since the daemon is closing anyway, waiting for a second should be alright.
Changelog-Fixed: Fixed a condition for newly created channels that could trigger a need for reconnect.
This alters the billboard, but that's a human-readable thing so not
noted in CHANGELOG.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: JSON-RPC: `listpeers` `status` now refers to "channel ready" rather than "funding locked" (BOLT language change for zeroconf channels)
Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `channel_opened` notification `channel_ready` flag.
Changelog-Deprecated: JSON-RPC: `channel_opened` notification `funding_locked` flag (use `channel_ready`: BOLTs namechange).
This contains the zeroconf stuff, with funding_locked renamed to
channel_ready. I change that everywhere, and try to fix up the
comments.
Also the `alias` field is called `short_channel_id`.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Changed: Protocol: `funding_locked` is now called `channel_ready` as per latest BOLTs.
1. fromwire now allocates TLVs, so this was actually a leak.
2. We can simply hand "NULL" to towire_, since that is the same as
this empty tlv.
```
...89221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-dualopend-chan#1: MEMLEAK: 0x56148649c458
...89221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-dualopend-chan#1: label=wire/peer_exp_wiregen.c:1041:struct tlv_channel_reestablish_tlvs
...89221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-dualopend-chan#1: backtrace:
...89221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-dualopend-chan#1: /home/rusty/devel/cvs/lightning/ccan/ccan/tal/tal.c:442 (tal_alloc_)
...89221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-dualopend-chan#1: /home/rusty/devel/cvs/lightning/wire/peer_exp_wiregen.c:1041 (tlv_channel_reestablish_tlvs_new)
...89221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-dualopend-chan#1: /home/rusty/devel/cvs/lightning/openingd/dualopend.c:3536 (do_reconnect_dance)
...89221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-dualopend-chan#1: /home/rusty/devel/cvs/lightning/openingd/dualopend.c:3955 (main)
...89221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-dualopend-chan#1: ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 (__libc_start_call_main)
...89221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-dualopend-chan#1: ../csu/libc-start.c:392 (__libc_start_main_impl)
...89221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59-dualopend-chan#1: parents:
```
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
With `option_zeroconf` we may now send `channel_ready` at any time we
want, rendering the `mindepth` parameter a mere heads up. We ignore it
in favor of our own value, since we plan to trigger releasing the
`channel_ready` once we reach our own depth.
Rusty Russell
Greg Sanders
adi2011
niftynei
Michael Schmoock
Christian Decker
Dustin Dettmer