We check that memcmp *isn't* constant time, but that's only true under
-O2 or above: __OPTIMIZE__ doesn't distinguish.
So we need a finer-grained test. Also reduce verbosity by default.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Unfortuntely we get spurious uninitialized variable warnings with
anything but -O3 or no optimization, so set default CWARNFLAGS
appropriately.
MCP bench results without optimization:
store_load_msec:28509-31001(29206.6+/-9.4e+02)
vsz_kb:580004-580016(580006+/-4.8)
store_rewrite_sec:11.640000-12.730000(11.908+/-0.41)
listnodes_sec:1.790000-1.880000(1.83+/-0.032)
listchannels_sec:21.180000-21.950000(21.476+/-0.27)
routing_sec:2.210000-11.160000(7.126+/-3.1)
peer_write_all_sec:36.270000-41.200000(38.168+/-1.9)
MCP bench with -Og: 22% speedup vs no optimization
store_load_msec:21963-23645(22841+/-6.6e+02)
vsz_kb:579916
store_rewrite_sec:10.080000-10.960000(10.456+/-0.3)
listnodes_sec:1.280000-1.390000(1.338+/-0.047)
listchannels_sec:14.770000-16.080000(15.518+/-0.46)
routing_sec:0.990000-6.660000(3.958+/-2.2)
peer_write_all_sec:29.950000-32.950000(31.138+/-1)
MCP bench with -O2: 31% speedup vs no optimization
store_load_msec:20713-22088(21505.6+/-4.8e+02)
vsz_kb:579928
store_rewrite_sec:9.570000-11.200000(10.192+/-0.54)
listnodes_sec:0.960000-1.090000(1.028+/-0.045)
listchannels_sec:10.400000-11.770000(11.012+/-0.48)
routing_sec:0.300000-3.140000(1.978+/-1.1)
peer_write_all_sec:28.980000-30.310000(29.572+/-0.44)
MCP bench with -O3 -flto: 36% speedup vs no optimization
store_load_msec:19616-20191(19862.6+/-1.9e+02)
vsz_kb:578452
store_rewrite_sec:8.980000-9.960000(9.55+/-0.32)
listnodes_sec:0.920000-1.910000(1.18+/-0.38)
listchannels_sec:8.960000-9.450000(9.206+/-0.16)
routing_sec:0.730000-1.850000(1.438+/-0.42)
peer_write_all_sec:28.090000-29.410000(28.772+/-0.42)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We try to look up the funding tx, but it's already spent that to fund
the channel, so we need txindex if this test is to work reliably.
It's not clear to me why this *ever* worked, but if fails on my new
ThreadRipper build machine with valgrind:
> wallettx = l1.bitcoin.rpc.getrawtransaction(wallettxid, True)
...
E bitcoin.rpc.InvalidAddressOrKeyError: {'code': -5, 'message': 'No such mempool transaction. Use -txindex to enable blockchain transaction queries. Use gettransaction for wallet transactions.'}
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/bitcoin/rpc.py:231: InvalidAddressOrKeyError
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Instead of reading the store ourselves, we can just send them an
offset. This saves gossipd a lot of work, putting it where it belongs
(in the daemon responsible for the specific peer).
MCP bench results:
store_load_msec:28509-31001(29206.6+/-9.4e+02)
vsz_kb:580004-580016(580006+/-4.8)
store_rewrite_sec:11.640000-12.730000(11.908+/-0.41)
listnodes_sec:1.790000-1.880000(1.83+/-0.032)
listchannels_sec:21.180000-21.950000(21.476+/-0.27)
routing_sec:2.210000-11.160000(7.126+/-3.1)
peer_write_all_sec:36.270000-41.200000(38.168+/-1.9)
Signficant savings in streaming gossip:
-peer_write_all_sec:48.160000-51.480000(49.608+/-1.1)
+peer_write_all_sec:35.780000-37.980000(36.43+/-0.81)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These are always handed to subdaemons as a set, so group them. This makes
it easier to add an fd (in the next patch).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We need to store the channel capacity for channel_announcement: hand it
in directly rather than having the gossip_store code do a lookup.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Save some overhead, plus gets us ready for giving subdaemons direct
store access. This is the first time we *upgrade* the gossip_store,
rather than just discarding.
The downside is that we need to add an extra message after each
channel_announcement, containing the channel capacity.
After:
store_load_msec:28337-30288(28975+/-7.4e+02)
vsz_kb:582304-582316(582306+/-4.8)
store_rewrite_sec:11.240000-11.800000(11.55+/-0.21)
listnodes_sec:1.800000-1.880000(1.84+/-0.028)
listchannels_sec:22.690000-26.260000(23.878+/-1.3)
routing_sec:2.280000-9.570000(6.842+/-2.8)
peer_write_all_sec:48.160000-51.480000(49.608+/-1.1)
Differences:
-vsz_kb:582320
+vsz_kb:582316
-listnodes_sec:2.100000-2.170000(2.118+/-0.026)
+listnodes_sec:1.800000-1.880000(1.84+/-0.028)
-peer_write_all_sec:51.600000-52.550000(52.188+/-0.34)
+peer_write_all_sec:48.160000-51.480000(49.608+/-1.1)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We know exactly how many there will be, so allocate an entire array up-front.
-listnodes_sec:2.540000-2.610000(2.584+/-0.029)
+listnodes_sec:2.100000-2.170000(2.118+/-0.026)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
[devtools/create-gossipstore.c:153]: (error) Uninitialized variable: scidsats
scidsats access is gated by csvfile, which means this warning is a false
positive. However, it's cleaner to gate scidsts on itself, rather than
the cmdline option which caused it to be populated, so do that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We were checking against a hard-coded list, now we return a valid address only
if the hrp matches the chainparams.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
The chainparams are needed to know the prefixes, so instead of passing down
the testnet, we pass the entire params struct.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We had a bit of a hand-woven mess in there, trying to inject the extra
arguments in the correct places. We now instead treat positional and keyword
calls separately and can go back to using the builtin argument binding again.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
The old codes if % 1000 statement logic was simply inverted
and produced the opposite output of the intention behin it.
Before Fix:
- Millisatoshi('42sat').to_btc_str() => 0.00000042000btc
- Millisatoshi('42001msat').to_btc_str() => 0.00000042btc
After Fix:
- Millisatoshi('42sat').to_btc_str() => 0.00000042btc
- Millisatoshi('42001msat').to_btc_str() => 0.00000042001btc
For performance reasons we start the lightningd instances in
parallel. However, if we only assign the numeric ids (used for log-prefixes
and home directories) when we are already running in parallel, we are not
guaranteed to get the numeric ids matching the return value of `get_nodes` or
`line_graph`. With this patch we now select numeric ids before parallelizing
the start.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <@cdecker>
Here I add the test for this 5 local_failed case in this commit.
There 5 cases for FORWARD_LOCAL_FAILED status:
1. When Msater resolves the reply about the next peer infor(sent by Gossipd), and need handle unknown next peer failure in channel_resolve_reply();
2. When Master handle the forward process with the htlc_in and the id of next hop, it tries to drive a new htlc_out but fails in forward_htlc();
3. When we send htlc_out, Master asks Channeld to add a new htlc into the outgoing channel but Channeld fails. Master need handle and store this failure in rcvd_htlc_reply();
4. When Channeld receives a new revoke message, if the state of corresponding htlc is RCVD_ADD_ACK_REVOCATION, Master will tries to resolve onionpacket and handle the failure before resolving the next hop in peer_got_revoke();
5. When Onchaind finds the htlc time out or missing htlc, Master need handle these failure as FORWARD_LOCAL_FAILED in if it's forward payment case.
We can be spammy, which is good for tests, but bad for our simple message queue.
This avoids breaking our tests but also avoid the worst case (1M entries and counting!)
for gossip status messages in the case where we're syncing a large peer.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
for now we straight copy the `extracted_peer_wire_csv` over into the
file that is used to generate the .c/.h files; in the future
we'll use this destination file as a way to modify the
`gen_peer_wire_csv`s from a patch.
We were deciding whether an address is a testnet address or not in the parser,
and then checking whether it matches our expectation outside as well. This
just returns the address version instead, and still checks it against our
expectation, but without having the parser need to know about address types.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This is an intermediate step since the only difference between p2pkh and p2sh
is the argument that the parsing functions take, and parsing twice for that
reason alone is quite useless.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Entries we've already loaded expect to exist in the store. We could go
back and remove them all, but instead just truncate at the known-good
point.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Sjors Provoost
darosior
Christian Decker
Michael Schmoock
trueptolemy
lisa neigut