Note: Unlike before, this will now accept positional parameters.
Note: In case of error we no longer report the hop number. Is this acceptable?
We still report the name of the bad param and its value.
One option is to log the hop number if param() returns false. This would require
a change to command_fail so it doesn't delete the cmd, so we can still
access cmd->ld->log.
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
This was a very simple change and allowed us to remove the special
`json_opt_tok` macro.
Moved the callback out of `common/json.c` to `lightningd/json.c` because the new
callbacks are dependent on `struct command` etc.
(I already started on `json_tok_number`)
My plan is to:
1. upgrade json_tok_X one a time, maybe a PR for each one.
2. When done, rename macros (i.e, remove "_tal").
3. Remove all vestiges of the old callbacks
4. Add new callbacks so that we no longer need json_tok_tok!
(e.g., json_tok_label, json_tok_str, json_tok_msat)
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
This adds one line with the onion and the channel_update we extract from
it. This in turn allows us to check that the channel_update in the onion is not
type prefixed, and that we patch it correctly before passing it to gossipd.
As was pointed out by @robtex we have underspecified the format of the nested
`channel_update` in the onionreply: lnd and eclair inserted the raw
channel_update without the type prefix, while we went for the full wire format,
including the type prefix. While we agreed that with the type it is more
flexible, and consistent, we decided to adapt to the majority and at least be
compatibly broken.
This commit takes care of being able to interpret either format correctly. It's
not perfect since signatures can happen to start with 0x0102 (the channel_update
type) but that'll happen only once ever 65k failures.
Removed `json_get_params`.
Also added json_tok_percent and json_tok_newaddr. Probably should
have been a separate PR but it was so easy.
[ Squashed comment update for gcc workaround --RR ]
Signed-off-by: Mark Beckwith <wythe@intrig.com>
structeq() is too dangerous: if a structure has padding, it can fail
silently.
The new ccan/structeq instead provides a macro to define foo_eq(),
which does the right thing in case of padding (which none of our
structures currently have anyway).
Upgrade ccan, and use it everywhere. Except run-peer-wire.c, which
is only testing code and can use raw memcmp(): valgrind will tell us
if padding exists.
Interestingly, we still declared short_channel_id_eq, even though
we didn't define it any more!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Until now, `command_fail()` reported an error code of -1 for all uses.
This PR adds an `int code` parameter to `command_fail()`, requiring the
caller to explicitly include the error code.
This is part of #1464.
The majority of the calls are used during parameter validation and
their error code is now JSONRPC2_INVALID_PARAMS.
The rest of the calls report an error code of LIGHTNINGD, which I defined to
-1 in `jsonrpc_errors.h`. The intention here is that as we improve our error
reporting, all occurenaces of LIGHTNINGD will go away and we can eventually
remove it.
I also converted calls to `command_fail_detailed()` that took a `NULL` `data`
parameter to use the new `command_fail()`.
The only difference from an end user perspecive is that bad input errors that
used to be -1 will now be -32602 (JSONRPC2_INVALID_PARAMS).
Internally both payment and routing use 64-bit, but the interface
between them used 32-bit.
Since both components already support 64-bit we should use that.
This fixes the root cause of https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/1212
where we deleted the payment because we wanted to retry, then retry failed
so we had an (old) HTLC without a matching payment. We then fed that
HTLC to onchaind, which tells us it's missing, and we try to fail the
payment and deref a NULL pointer.
Fixes: #1212
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Needed for particular race condition: client calls `sendpay` with
intent to call `waitsendpay` later to get information, but the
payment fails after `sendpay` returns but before client can invoke
`waitsendpay`.
This lets client know of information even if it manages to invoke
`waitsendpay` "late".
Mark Beckwith
Mark Beckwith
Christian Decker
Rusty Russell
ZmnSCPxj, ZmnSCPxj jxPCSmnZ
practicalswift
Corné Plooy