The master now hands channeld either an error code, and channeld
generates the error message, or an error message relayed from another
node to pass through.
This doesn't fill in the channel_update yet: we need to wire up gossipd
to give us that.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This addresses a performance regression introduced by
6ceb375650. We were storing it in an
otherwise empty DB transaction, which means that DB transaction was no
longer a no-op. Now we defer storing until we need to store the
corresponding HTLC anyway, so we can just piggyback on top of that
transaction.
This is also more consistent since we'd be forgetting the payment
anyway if we restart between adding the HTLC and committing to it.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
While loading HTLCs from the database we might not yet have all the
incoming HTLCs loaded when loading a dependent htlc_out. So we defer
the wiring of the HTLCs until we are sure we have them loaded.
This is also the first step towards keeping that association only in
the database, since otherwise we cannot selectively load channels from
DB.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Also, we split the more sophisticated json_add helpers to avoid pulling in
everything into lightning-cli, and unify the routines to print struct
short_channel_id (it's ':', not '/' too).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In the case where we can't decrypt the onion, we can't fail it in the
normal way (which is encrypted using the onion shared secret), we need
to respond with a update_fail_malformed_htlc message.
Moreover, we need to remember this for persistence. This means that
we really have three conclusions for an HTLC: fulfilled, failed,
malformed. Fix up the logic everywhere which assumed failed or
fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
They share some fields, but they're basically different, and it's clearest
to treat them differently in most places.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
When adding their HTLCs, it needs all the information. When failing,
it needs the id as key and the failure reason. When fulfilling, it
needs the id and payment preimage.
It also needs to know when we have received an revoke_and_ack or a
commitment_signed, to place in the database.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We still get the shared secret, since that requires a round trip to the HSM
(why waste the master daemon's time?) but it does the processing, which
simplifies the message passing and things like realm handling which
have nothing to do with this particular channeld.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Some paths were still sending unencrypted failure messages; unify them
all. We need to keep the fail_msg around for resubmission if the
channeld dies; similarly, we need to keep the htlc_end structure
itself after failure, in case the failed HTLC is committed: we can
move it to a minimal archive once it's flushed from both sides,
however.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We alternated between using a sha256 and using a privkey, but there are
numerous places where we have a random 32 bytes which are neither.
This fixes many of them (plus, struct privkey is now defined in terms of
struct secret).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Since we now use the short_channel_id to identify the next hop we need
to resolve the channel_id to the pubkey of the next hop. This is done
by calling out to `gossipd` and stuffing the necessary information
into `htlc_end` and recovering it from there once we receive a reply.
This lets us link HTLCs from one peer to another; but for the moment it
simply means we can adjust balance when an HTLC is fulfilled.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker