Rather than using LightningJSONDecoder's implicit "field name and
value ends in msat, try converting to Millisatoshi", we do it to
parameters using type annotations.
If you had a parameter which was an array or dict itself, we don't
delve into that, but that's probably OK.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I originally converted input JSON naively into Millisatoshi, and the
result was a strange failure in Millisatoshi.__eq__.
It seems this is because inspect._empty.__eq__(Millisatoshi) raises
NotImplemented, and so it tries Millisatoshi.__eq__(inspect._empty)
which doesn't like it.
'is' is the correct test here, AFAICT, and doesn't suffer from these
problems.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Some JSON functions want a *class*, not just a hook, so provide one.
To make it clear that we want an encoding *class* and a decoding *object*,
rename the UnixDomainSocketRpc encode parameter to encode_cls.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If we can't marshall an object into JSON, the exception causes a deadlock
and we don't get any results.
Instead of deadlocking, our failure now is:
lightning.lightning.RpcError: RPC call failed: method: echo, payload: {'msat': 17msat}, error: Error while processing echo: TypeError("Object of type 'Millisatoshi' is not JSON serializable",)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We don't, but we should, like we do for normal RPC. However, I chose
to use function annotations, rather than names-ending-in-'msat'
because it's more Pythony.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I tried annotating the plugin-millisatoshis.py plugin, and it failed like so:
plugin-millisatoshis.py Killing plugin: "getmanifest" result is not an object: {"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 1, "error": "Error while processing getmanifest: ValueError(\'Function has keyword-only parameters or annotations, use getfullargspec() API which can support them\',)"}'
So, let's do that!
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
For the moment it's only Ubuntu 18.04.1.
Complete documentation is in the final commit; you can test this using
the prior commit and comparing with my intermediate files and results
at:
https://ozlabs.org/~rusty/clightning-repro
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
New name is less confusing, and most people should be transitioning to
listpays rather than this anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is to future-proof against multi-part-payments: the low-level commands
will start returning multiple results once we have that, so prepare
transition plan now.
Closes: #2372
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This is the same deprecation, but one level up. For the moment, we
still support invoices with a `h` field (where description will be
necessary) but that will be removed once this option is removed.
Note that I just changed pylightning without backwards compatibility,
since the field was unlikely to be used, but we could do something
more complex here?
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This field was used by `pay` to hold the bolt11 description if the bolt11
string used `h` to hash the description (which nobody ever did). If the
`h` field wasn't present, it could contain anything, as it wasn't checked.
It's really useful to have a label for payments (eg. '1 Cuban'), but adding
yet-another option would be painful, so we simply rename 'description'
to 'label' except inside the db.
This means we need to do some tricky parameter parsing to handle array
and keyword JSON arguments, but only until we remove the old name.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Without this, there's no proof of payment, since it is the signed invoice
that make the receipt valid.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
I tried to fundchannel 0.01btc, and of course it wanted 8 decimals exactly.
If I can't get this right, it's probably a bad idea.
I still don't allow whole number of btc though, since that's probably a mistake
and you're not supposed to put that much in c-lightning yet :)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If you use use CC='gcc <options>' this blocks ASAN. Of course, no
check is perfect, but this catches the obvious misuse still.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
In particular this matches the case of `their_unilateral/to_us` outputs, which
were missing their addresses so far.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
onchaind is in the correct position to tell us about them, so have it pass
them up as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
In order to avoid having to ask the HSM for public keys to
their_unilateral/to_us outputs we just store the `scriptPubkey` with the UTXO,
which can then be converted to the P2WPKH address.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Without this the RPC will fail to continue buffering if the response does not
fit in the first read, and if we don't switch over to the non-compat
mode. This was introduced by our mitigation of the UTF-8 misalignment, but I
missed this path.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We want to disallow using unconfirmed outputs by default, so making the
default 1 confirmation seems a good idea. This also matches `bitcoind`s
minimum confirmation requirement.
Arming however breaks some of our tests, so I used `minconf=0` for the
breaking tests and added a new test specifically for the `minconf` parameter
for `fundchannel`.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This allows us to specify that an output must have been confirmed before the
given maximum height. This allows us to specify a minimum number of
confirmations for an output to be selected.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This will make the logger write 4 newlines to re-attached logfiles.
The newlines wont appear on logfiles that are just created.
Additionally the server prints 50 '-' dashes before printing his
startup message, which also help increase readability on logfile.
This was inspired by the way Bitcoin Core handles logfiles.
These weren't checked by CI yet, and they are really short so I just added
them to the check-python target.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This indicates that the method or hook will accepts a request
parameter, and will use that to return the result or raise an
exception instead of returning the return value. This allows the hook
or method to stash the incomplete request or pass it around, without
blocking the JSON-RPC interface.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
This isn't a problem for now since we don't support multithreading,
and only allow synchronous calls, but eventually this'll become
important.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
We well need this in the next commit to be able to return from an
asynchronous call. We also guard stdout access with a reentrant lock
since we are no longer guaranteed that all communication happens on
the same thread.
Signed-off-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Rusty Russell
lisa neigut
Christian Decker
Michael Schmoock