We were assuming `wallet_channel_insert` that there cannot be a matching peer
if our in-memory representation isn't bound to it (`dbid == 0`). If we then
attempt to create the peer, and we already had one it'd cause a unique
constraint violation. As far as I can tell this could end up happening if we
have an uncommitted channel, and then exited without cleanup (`tal_destructor`
on the uncommitted channel not running). This could then leave the peer in the
DB. This is because the constraint that every peer has at least one channel is
not enforce at DB level, but rather in destructors that may or may not run.
Changelog-Fixed: Fixed a failing assertion if we reconnect to a peer that we had a channel with before, and then attempt to insert the peer into the DB twice.
7b899da801