For reference, the git source for this crate (and the others in its
workspace) currently lives in my personal github account (ijackson).
If this fork turns out to be long-lived and gains features and/or
users, it would be good to move it to a gitlab somewhere.
I have granted Nick crate ownership on the crates.io system.
Here we add a config option to disable safe logging, and ensure that
safe logging is disabled when we are formatting an error message on
exit (since we assume it's safe to write sensitive info to stderr.)
This is a rough first-cut of an API that I think might help us with
keeping limited categories of sensitive information out of our logs.
I'll refine it based on experiences with using it.
The environment where the test runner does its thing seems to want
to run as root with umask 000, which naturally makes the fs
permissions checks freak out.
* Builders additionally derive: Debug, Serialize, Deserialize.
* Validated structs no longer derive: Serialize, Deserialize
and all related attributes deleted.
* As a consequence, all the `#[serde(deny_unknown_fields)]`
are gone. That means that right now unknown fields are totally
ignored. This is good for compatibility but poor for useability.
Doing something better here is arti#417, in progress.
* As a consequence, delete tor_dirmgr::retry::default_parallelism.
(The default value was already duplicated into a builder attr.)
And drop the ad-hoc orport() method. This brings FallbackDir's
orports field in line with our list builder API.
The general semver note in "configuation" seems to cover most of this.
This allows us to use this with an item builder type which doesn't
impl Default. (Obviously this only makes sense for items which aren't
actually builders.)
It is Quite Vexing that we have to use [ ] rather than the < > around
the generics, particularly given that we are also using [ ] to signal
"this is arrayish".
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Although these do not appear in the config, it does have a builder.
It seems sensible to get rid of this ad-hoc list manipulation site,
and replace it with our standard list builder API.
define_list_builder_helper requires that the builder element type be
Deserialize. Currently GuardUsageRestriction is a transparent, public
enum, so we aren't really exposing anything.
We could introduce GuardUsageRestrictionBuilder now, but
since it's not in the config and thereofore only in the public API of
the lower crates, we can definitely put that off.
For at least one job, run the first cargo run with --locked. This
will fail if the lockfile needs updating.
I have verified that this correctly detects this situation:
https://gitlab.torproject.org/Diziet/arti/-/pipelines/37692
failed. Now I have rebased this branch onto main to get the fix to
Cargo.lock.
This type was returned by the public DownloadSchedule::builder
function. But the only thing that seems to have noticed that the type
name itself wasn't exported, was rustdoc. Hmmm.
The new API is (roughly) as discussed in
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/issues/451
This is quite a large commit and it is not convenient to split it up.
It contains the following changes:
* Redo the list builder and accessor macros implemnetation,
including docs and tests.
* Change uses of define_list_config_builder. In each case:
- Move the docs about the default value to the containing field.
- Remove the other docs (which were just recapitulations, and
are now not needed since the ListBuilder is no longer public).
- Rewmove or replace `pub` in the define_list_builder_helper call,
so that the builder is no longer public.
- Change the main macro call site to use define_list_builder_helper.
- Add a call to define_list_builder_accessors.
* Make the module `list_builder` pub so that we have somewhere to
put the overview documentation.
* Consequential changes:
- Change `outer.inner().replace(X)` to `outer.set_inner(X)`
- Consequential changes to imports (`use` statements).
Previously this field was differently named to its serde and to its
accessors. We are about to introduce a macro_rules macro which will
provide list accessors and we don't want that macro to have a field
renaming feature.
So stop renaming the field.