Instead of having 2 version of `StreamTarget::close` (a blocking one and
a nonblocking one), we can just return the `oneshot::Receiver` for
receiving the reactor's response and let the caller of
`StreamTarget::close` decide whether to block.
This allows us to reduce some code duplication in the `IncomingStream`
implementation.
This will allow us to proceed if
* the default config file locations can't be established
(eg due to failure of the `directories` crate), but
* configuration files are explicitly specified,
so the defaults wouldn't be used
Improves the error mesage in #989 somewhat.
Before:
target/debug/arti: error: Can't construct project directories to resolve a path element
After:
target/debug/arti: error: identify default config file locations: Can't construct project directories to resolve a path element
The two enums essentially serve the same purpose, so we don't
need both of them.
This also addresses the TODO that says we should return an error if
`accept_data` is called for a RESOLVE stream.
This is a follow-up from !1451.
This commit solves a `TODO HSS` introduced when `DataCmdChecker` got an
additional constructor (`new_connected`) for creating "pre-connected"
streams. See f6745d31 for more details.
Propagating the error means will cause the reactor to shut down (there's
not much the control message sender can do about it, so there's no point
in sending it the error).
As a result, by the time the `reject` future resolves, the stream has
been removed from the reactor's stream map and the corresponding END
cell has been sent.
Fixes#998.
`ClientCirc::allow_stream_requests` is now `async` and waits until the
`AwaitIncomingStream` control message is processed by the reactor.
This guarantees that by the time the `allow_stream_requests` future
resolves, the reactor is ready to process BEGIN/BEGIN_DIR/RESOLVE cells.
Previously, the client tasks from allow_stream_requests tests had to
sleep before sending the BEGIN cell to give the reactor time to process
the `AwaitIncomingStream` control message (which tells the reactor to
expect incoming BEGIN/BEGIN_DIR/RESOLVE cells on the circuit).
Fixes#994
The implementation here is perhaps excessively simple: we put
a `oneshot::Sender` in the `Reactor` object, and a
`Shared<oneshot::Receiver>` in the circuit or channel. When
the reactor is dropped, any copy of the `Shared<Receiver>` will
yield `Err(Cancelled)`.
I'm marking these methods as experimental because I'm not sure I've
thought of all the implications here, and we might want to change
things around.
Down the road, these methods might want to yield a `Result<>`
indicating why the reactor was shut down.
This feature was inspired by a request from Saksham Mittal, and a
felt need while working on !1472.
This will enable hidden services to send `RENDEZVOUS1` messages to the
`N`th hop of the circuit rather than the `N + 1`th virtual one (which
can only used after the client and service have completed the
introduction handshake).
This also deprecates `start_conversation_last_hop`.
Closes#959
`HopNum` will be used in `ClientCirc`'s public API when we refactor
`ClientCirc::start_conversation_last_hop` to use the provided hop rather
than always using the last one.
This `sleep` is to give the reactor task a chance to process the
`AwaitIncomingStream` message. With an 100ms, this test sometimes fails
because for some reason the reactor doesn't get a chance to process the
`AwaitIncomingStream` control command before the BEGIN cell from the
client task is received. This bumps the sleep time to 200ms for now
(TODO: follow-up with an MR with a less flaky approach).
While trying to repro the issue, I found another corner case for which
I've added a TODO HSS.
This updates the reactor to call the incoming stream handler even for
streams for which we have a stream map entry of `EndSent`. If we've
sent an END message for a stream but have not yet received an END
message back from the other party, but we later receive a BEGIN from
them, it is safe to assume we cam remove the stream from the stream map
and handle the new incoming stream request.
This adds a new `AwaitIncomingStream` control message for registering an
interest in an incoming stream.
This also adds a `ClosePendingStream` control message for explicitly
closing a stream with a given END message (needed for implementing
`IncomingStream::reject`).
This adds a new `add_ent_with_id` function for adding a new entry to the
`StreamMap`. The existing `add_ent` function auto-generates a new stream
ID, which is not good if we're a hidden service, as stream IDs are
supposed to be chosen by the OP (client). When accepting a new stream,
services, exit relays, and dir auths need to use the stream ID received
in the BEGIN cell (instead of generating a new stream ID).
When accepting a new stream, hidden services, exit relays and dirauths
don't wait for a `CONNECTED` cell from the initiator.
This commit adds constructors for building `DataStream`s and
`DataCmdChecker`s that can immediately receive data cells (and don't
expect to receive `CONNECTED` cells at all).
The build found a stale private doc comment as well as an exception
that needed to be made in check_doc_features.
The check_doc_features change solidifies a decision that things marked
with cfg(fuzzing) aren't part of the documented API.
This function isn't actually needed (it's not the responsibility of
`KeyType` to encode keys).
This commit also rewrites `ArtiNativeKeystore::insert` to use the new
`as_ssh_keypair_data` function instead of `to_ssh_format`.
The `EncodableKey::to_bytes` function didn't make much sense, because
not all keys have a canonical byte representation.
This commit replaces `EncodableKey::to_bytes` with
`EncodableKey::as_ssh_keypair_data`. In the future, `EncodableKey` will
grow functions for encoding keys in other storage formats too.
Closes#965
There are some places we might improve this, maybe testing more data
types and shapes. This patch just makes the minimal changes necessary
to get it working: adds allocation logic to the fuzzer itself,
and adds visibility for the bucket_array::mem interface.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
In response to review feedback, explain that 'seed' here is more
for compatibility and convenience and not central to our goal of
fuzzing the program generator.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
Fuzz testing for HashX. Uses a hook into the pseudorandom number
stream to test the program generator deeply on input that can
be mutated by the fuzzer. Confirms program generation by running
a small number of arbitrary test hashes, so we don't need to
understand the implementation-specific program format to test the
program generator.
We test four implementations in parallel this way, the compiled and
interpreted implementations included in both this crate and c-tor.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
The solve tests are all tunable so that we can balance execution time
with test coverage. A longer solve will test more random programs and it
will test more of the nonce increment function, minor benefits at the
cost of much more CPU.
The starting nonce in solve_effort1k_aa_41_01 was set so that we would
exercise a rollover in bit 7 of the nonce increment before the full
width rollover, but this wasn't a particularly helpful place to test
and certainly not worth the 13+ seconds it takes on my machine.
This patch bumps the starting nonce to a value much closer to the
target, and still including the full-width rollover.
Brings solve_effort1k_aa_41_01 down from 13.2 seconds to 0.5 sec for me.
For ticket #991
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
This test had one large function for all the verifies and one for all
the solves. The solve test was slow enough to be a bottleneck,
documented in ticket #991.
This patch splits the existing tests up in to one labeled function per
solve or verify configuration.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
Propagates this setting from the outer Cargo.toml to the new
benchmark crates, since they no longer get the setting by
being included in the main workspace.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
It might be useful to keep these locked down for benchmark
reproducibility. Currently the hashx and equix crates are
fully separate.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
This is a small batch of improvements for the equix and hashx
benchmarks. The headline feature is that we are now including
the C implementations (slightly modified from tevador's, hosted
as part of c-tor) and using them in apples-to-apples comparisons.
Minor features:
- Benchmarks moved to new nested crates, preventing their
dependencies from spilling into the main workspace build.
- Tests are now grouped
- We also test the performance of memory reuse where possible
- Code cleanup for per-runtime options
These benchmark builds will now automatically pull in the c-tor
git repo and build portions of it with a Rust wrapper. This uses
the 'cc' and 'bindgen' crates, so it requires a C compiler and
libclang on the host system.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
These crates have had trivial changes only: typically,
changes to documentation or to clippy warnings. There's no
good reason to update which version of them other crates depend on,
so we only bump _their_ patchlevels.
```
tor-async-utils
caret
safelog
tor-events
tor-units
tor-rtcompat
tor-rpcbase
tor-llcrypto
tor-protover
tor-bytes
tor-hscrypto
tor-socksproto
tor-cert
tor-cell
tor-consdiff
tor-congestion
arti-rpcserver
arti-testing
arti-bench
arti-config
arti-hyper
```
These crates are at version 0.x.y, so we don't need to distinguish
new-feature changes from other changes:
```
tor-basic-utils
fs-mistrust
tor-error
tor-geoip
tor-checkable
tor-linkspec
tor-netdoc
tor-netdir
tor-persist
tor-ptmgr
tor-hsservice
```
This crate has a breaking change, but only when the semver-breaking
feature `experimental-api` is enabled:
```
tor-config
```
This crate is at version 1.x.y, but has no new public APIs, and
therefore does not need a minor version bump:
```
arti
```
These crates had first-order breaking changes:
```
retry-error
tor-keymgr
tor-proto
tor-hsclient
tor-rtmock
```
Additionally, these broke because they re-exposed RetryError:
```
tor-circmgr
```
Additionally, these broke because they may re-expose something from
tor-proto:
```
arti-client
tor-chanmgr
tor-dirclient
tor-dirmgr
tor-guardmgr
```
Additionally, these broke for other fiddly reasons:
`tor-ptmgr` implements traits from tor-chanmgr, which has a breaking
change above.
`arti-hyper` exposes types from arti-client in its API.
This replaces the 'TODO' marker from earlier commits, using tevador's
copyright and license (LGPL 3.0 only) for the hashx and equix crates.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
Challenges are now built using try_extend_from_slice instead of
iterators. There's no CPU benchmark in this crate yet, but I can confirm
that the resulting code is shorter. With this patch, the entirety of
Challenge:new() is automatically inlined at call sites.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
I originally wrote this in an overcomplicated way, to avoid
frequent initialization of a RegisterWriter array. It turns out
that RegisterWriter can be fairly compact, so this extra level of
indirection isn't necessary or measurably helpful.
This still manages to avoid declaring RegisterWriter as Copy, by
using Default to initialize the array instead of an array constructor.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
In response to review feedback. The byte output is only needed
for unit tests right now, since Equi-X uses u64 output exclusively.
The optimization for shorter output widths can shave tiny amounts of
time off hash benchmarks, but in this case it's more helpful to avoid
introducing APIs that offer parameters with incomplete compile-time
range checking.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
This refactors the random number generator used within HashX's program
generator so that it uses the rand::RngCore trait. The basic SipHash
powered u64 generator now implements RngCore, while a buffer layer
wraps this and provides u8 and u32 values as needed by the generator.
Some of this new RngCore layer is now exposed to the hashx crate's
public API. The intent is to allow external code to test, benchmark, or
fuzz the program generator by supplying its own random number stream.
Benchmarks show a small but confusing performance improvement
associated with this patch. About a 2% improvement in generation.
This could be due to the Rng changes. No change in compiled hash
execution performance. Even though this patch only touches program
generation, benchmarks show a 4% speedup in interpreted execution.
This seems most likely explained by instruction cache effects,
but I'm not sure.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
This splits up bucket_array into two smaller modules, one for the hash
table behavior and one for the MaybeUninit memory management.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
I was hoping most of the program generator would get inlined, so we can
resolve a lot of the edge cases at compile-time. This patch gets us
close to that, adding many inline attrs and rewriting RegisterSet with
explicit unrolling and storage types that are easier for the optimizer
to reason about.
From the disassembly of the program generator, it's now mostly one big
function with a jump table. From callgrind instruction profiles, there
are no longer obvious hotspots in register set scanning loops. It also
looks like we're often keeping per-register schedule information all
loaded into machine registers now.
Keeping the Rng entry points non-inlined for now seems to be slightly
better, by a percent or two.
There's some work left to do in compiled programs, and maybe room for
improvement in the Program representation too. That will be in a future
patch.
Benchmark shows about 20% improvement on my machine,
generate-interp time: [75.440 µs 75.551 µs 75.684 µs]
change: [-24.083% -23.775% -23.483%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 11 outliers among 100 measurements (11.00%)
5 (5.00%) high mild
6 (6.00%) high severe
generate-x86_64 time: [96.068 µs 96.273 µs 96.540 µs]
change: [-18.699% -18.381% -18.013%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
4 (4.00%) high mild
6 (6.00%) high severe
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
This adds a new tor-hspow crate with the first layers of support in
place for onion service client puzzles as described in Proposal 327.
The API here is experimental, and it's currently only implementing
the self-contained parts of the client puzzle. So, it can verify and
solve puzzles, but it has no event loop integration or nonce replay
tracking or prioritization code yet. These things seem like they would
eventually live in the same crate.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
This is a new pure Rust implementation of the Equi-X algorithm
designed by tevador for Tor's onion service proof of work puzzle v1.
Equi-X is an asymmetric puzzle algorithm based on Equihash, with
N=60, K=3, the XOR replaced with modular addition, a 16-bit index
space, and HashX as the inner hash function.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
This is a new pure Rust implementation of the HashX algorithm
designed by tevador for Tor's onion service proof of work puzzle v1.
HashX is a lightweight family of randomly generated hash functions.
A seed, via blake2 and siphash, drives a program generation model
which randomly selects opcodes and registers while following some
constraints that avoid timing stalls or insufficient hash mixing.
The execution of these hash funcions can be done using a pure Rust
interpreter, or about 20x faster using a very simple just in time
compiler based on the dynasm assembler crate. This has been
implemented for x86_64 and aarch64.
Signed-off-by: Micah Elizabeth Scott <beth@torproject.org>
I think it's safe to handle `ChanMsg::Create` separately, because
there's nothing for the reactor to do until the first hop of the circuit
is created (so blocking on this _should_ be alright).
This logic from `create_firsthop()` was extracted (copied) from
`Reactor::run_once()`. A future commit will update `Reactor::run_once()`
to use `create_firsthop()`.
rustfmt has grown opinions about how let ... else ... ought to be
formatted. They don't always agree with our previous manual
decisions.
I think our policy is to always insist on rustfmt. When that version
of rustfmt hits stable, our CI will start to fail for everyone.
(Right now this discrepancy just causes trouble for contributors who
are using nightly by default.)
This will enable us to test the parts of `ArtiNativeKeystore::insert`
that _are_ implemented (such as the part where it creates the missing
directories).
cargo doc --locked --document-private-items --workspace --all-features
warning: unclosed HTML tag `CountryCode`
--> crates/tor-geoip/src/lib.rs:90:54
|
90 | /// We store these as NonZeroU8 so that an Option<CountryCode> only has to
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(rustdoc::invalid_html_tags)]` on by default
The concept of a "key bundle" would introduce a lot of complexity while
providing little to no gain.
Some context:
```
Originally, "key bundles" were meant to be the answer to the question
"which keystore should insert place keys in?":
36606a66dd/crates/tor-keymgr/src/mgr.rs (L60-69)
However, I'm not so sure anymore that "key bundles" are the answer. I
don't think there is any way we can "guess" where a key should go. When
inserting/generating a new key, we should either:
always write to the same, primary key store, OR require the user to be
explicit about which key store the new key should go in (by assigning an
ID to each key store and expecting the user to provide it when
inserting/generating new keys)
I prefer the latter option, because it provides more flexibility, which
we're going to need when implementing the key management CLI (which I
think should allow users to generate keys anywhere they want, e.g. arti
keymgr generate <key type> --keystore hsm ...)
```
For more details, see the discussion on #903.
Closes#903
The caller uses `KeystoreSelector` to specify which keystore to insert
the new key into (only `KeystoreSelector::Id` and
`KeystoreSelector::Default` are supported for `insert`).
The ability to insert keys in a particular keystore will come in handy
when we implement the key management CLI (the CLI will have an option
for specifying the keystore to access/modify).
This error will be returned by `KeyMgr` if the caller tries to access a
keystore that does not exist, or if the requested `KeystoreSelector`
cannot be applied.
This will enable the `KeyMgr` to look up `Keystore`s by ID (which is
a requirement for disambiguating the semantics of `insert`, which
currently tries to "guess" which keystore it should be using).
Hiding the underlying value of `enabled` enables us to give it a
different `auto` value depending on whether the `keymgr` feature is
enabled or not (it defaults to `true` if `keymgr` is enabled, and
`false` otherwise).
The `experimental-api` was only meant to apply to the use of the
unstable `ArtiNativeKeystoreConfig` in the Arti config.
`experimental-api` was _not_ supposed to be used for enabling/disabling
the keystore (that's what the `enabled` flag is for).
This would be a break in higher-layer crates which incorproate this
error but:
1. That's just arti-client which hides it behind the detailed errors
cargo feature
2. I'm hoping cargo-semver-checks would spot it, anyway.
The effect is that everywhere a RetryError is used, the error sources
for the contained errors will be Display'd.
In tor-hsclient we no longer need to explicitly wrap things up in
tor_error::Report.
We don't use OsString now except where it appears in our public API,
or where we get it from std::env.
Moving the `use` statements into the use sites enabled me to see
that I had found all the places I wanted to change.
users is unmaintained. pwd-grp is the crate I have just written to
replace it. In this commit:
Change the cargo dependency and imports.
Replace the cacheing arrangements. users has a built-in cache;
pwd-grp doesn't. Now, instead of cashing individual lookups, we cache
the trusted user and trusted gid calculation results.
This saves on some syscalls, and is also more convenient to write.
(Mocking is still done via the dependency.)
Many systematic consequential changes of details:
* The entrypoint names to the library are different:
pwd-grp uses the names of the corresponding Unix functions.
* pwd-grp's returned structs are transparent, so we don't
call accessors for .uid(), .name(), etc.
* pwd-grp's methods are much more often fallible
(returning io::Result<Option<...>)
* We're using the non-UTF-8 pwd-grp API, which means we must
use turbofish syntax in some places.
* The mocking API is a bit different.
Add some wrapper functions for convenience.
The pwd-grp crate has a richer and more faithful, but not so
convenient, way of creating dummy user/group entries. Also the type
names are all going to change.
Doing this now reduces churn.
The actual underlying operations here *are* fallible.
The `users` crate hides those errors in several cases.
(Failures are very rare (at least unless NIS is involved), so this is
not of much practical import, but it's going to be necessary when we
use the more careful pwd-grp crate.
Gabriela Moldovan
Ian Jackson
Nick Mathewson
Micah Elizabeth Scott
Ian Jackson
Saksham Mittal
sw1tch
Dimitris Apostolou
juga
Alexander Færøy