Now it just returns true if it queued something. This allows it
to queue multiple packets, and lets it share code paths with other code
in future patches.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As we add more features, the current code is insufficient.
1. Keep an array of single feature bits, for easy switching on and off.
2. Create feature_offered() which checks for both compulsory and optional
variants.
3. Invert requires_unsupported_features() and unsupported_features()
which tend to be double-negative, all_supported_features() and
features_supported().
4. Move single feature definition from wire/peer_wire.h to common/features.h.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We currently keep two copies; one in the broadcast structure to send
in order, and one in the routing information. Since we already keep
the broadcast index in the routing information, use that.
Conveniently, a zero index is the same as the old NULL test.
Rename struct node's announcement_idx to node_announce_msgidx to
make it match the other users.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We tal_dup_arr() it, which does take. Make it const in the structure;
the tal_dup_arr() removes the const, so it compiles without it, but it's
misleading.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
We only access via index. We do, however, want to clean up when we
delete nodes and channels, so we tie lifetimes to that. This leads
us to put the index into 'struct queued_message'.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
1. make queue_peer_msg() use both if branches, as both equally likely.
2. Remove redundant *scid = NULL in handle_channel_announcement.
3. Log failing pending channel_updates.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
As per BOLT #7.
We don't do this for channel_update which are queued because the
channel_announcement is pending though.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
If the channel is pending, we queue the node_announcment and if the channel
is OK we re-call process_node_announcement. Make sure that second call
won't fail if the first succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Improve usability in these scenarios:
* bitcoin-cli not available in PATH and/or bitcoind not running
* bitcoin-cli available in PATH but bitcoind is not running
We say "in N blocks" but we actually mean "N blocks after this tx" which is
actually N-1 or less. Change wording and tighten tests which misunderstood
this.
Also, the 'assert not l1.daemon.is_in_log('onchaind complete, forgetting peer')'
are unlikely to work until the daemon has actually seen the block, so add
sync_blockheight before all of those.
These changes reveal some sloppy testing, which we fix.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
With the following patch applied, we could clearly see onchaind try to
broadcast the timeout tx one block too early:
sendrawtx exit 26, gave error code: -26?error message:?non-final (code 64)?
This is because of an out-by-one error in calculating the relative
depth required, since the out->tx_blockheight is already 1 before the
current block.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This was revealed in #1114; onchaind isn't actually completely idempotent
due to fee changes (and the now-fixed change in keys used).
This triggers the bug by restarting with different fees, resulting in
onchaind not recognizing its own proposal:
2018-03-05T09:38:15.550Z lightningd(23076): lightning_onchaind-022d223620a359a47ff7f7ac447c85c46c923da53389221a0054c11c1e3ca31d59 chan #1: STATUS_FAIL_INTERNAL_ERROR: THEIR_UNILATERAL/OUR_HTLC spent with weird witness 3
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
The root cause of #1114 was that the restarted onchaind created a
different proposal to the one which had previously been mined:
2018-03-01T09:41:08.884Z lightningd(1): lightning_onchaind-020d3d5995a973c878e3f6e5f59da54078304c537f981d7dcef73367ecbea0e90e chan #1: STATUS_FAIL_INTERNAL_ERROR: THEIR_UNILATERAL/OUR_HTLC spent with weird witness 3
After the previous patches which fixed the output address difference,
we could identify proposals by their outputs, but during the
transition (onchaind started with old buggy version, restarted now)
that wouldn't be right, so we match the inputs, discarding signatures
which will be different. This works for all current cases.
Closes: #1114
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
It would be better to give them unique values, but we don't fully support
db migrate anyway and this is simple (though they will end up using the
same key for multiple channel closes if created before this commit).
Note that even if bip32_max_index is currently unset, it defaults to 0
so it will be found.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This simplifies things, and means it's always in the database. Our
previous approach to creating it on the fly had holes when it was
created for onchaind, causing us to use another every time we
restarted.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell
Christian Decker
ZmnSCPxj
John Barboza
Isidoro Ghezzi
practicalswift
nicolas.dorier